Is Gravity Really the Weakest Force in the Universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FredrikJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Weak
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the characterization of gravity as the weakest fundamental force in the universe, exploring the reasons behind this perception and the implications of comparing gravity to other forces such as electromagnetism and nuclear forces. Participants delve into theoretical considerations, the nature of force mediation, and the potential for gravity to operate in additional dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that gravity's weakness compared to other forces may be due to its propagation in additional dimensions.
  • Others argue that while the mechanisms of gravity and other forces differ, it is still valid to compare their relative strengths.
  • A participant mentions that theoretical measurements of forces, such as the electric force in a hydrogen atom versus gravitational force, show a significant difference in strength.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that the need for an explanation of gravity's relative weakness is unnecessary if the forces operate fundamentally differently.
  • One participant emphasizes that the mathematical models of gravity and other forces may indicate fundamental differences, but does not clarify whether this is a definitive conclusion.
  • A later reply humorously highlights the practical implications of gravity's weakness by stating that it takes a whole planet to cause significant harm, underscoring the force's relative weakness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether comparing the strengths of gravity and other forces is meaningful, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus on the necessity of an explanation for gravity's relative weakness.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the differences in mechanisms behind the forces but do not resolve the implications of these differences for understanding their relative strengths. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of forces and the validity of comparisons that remain unexamined.

FredrikJ
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
All physicists I've heard discussing gravity to the public always mentions that it's a very weak force compared to the other forces and that no one knows why. One possible reason could be that the gravitational force is propagating in other dimensions.
As far as I know gravity works in a completely different way compared to the other forces. The other forces use carrier particles but gravity works by curving the fabric of space and time.
Aren't we comparing apples and oranges when we are comparing the strength of gravity to the strength of the other fundamental forces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FredrikJ said:
Aren't we comparing apples and oranges when we are comparing the strength of gravity to the strength of the other fundamental forces?
I feel that it is not really for me to answer this question (others here have the actual knowledge to do so), but I would think that one can still compare the relative strength of different fundamental forces, even though these forces may be mediated by different mechanisms. In other words, I don't think this is a matter of comparing apples and oranges. Is this correct?
 
See e.g.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/victor-stenger/myths-of-physics-2-gravit_b_5718233.html

I'd say the comparison is not that bad. In theory we can measure e.g. the electric force between a proton and a neutron in a Hydrogen-atom, and do the same for gravity. Doing the math with it gives a huge difference. between the two. Of course, in GR gravity is merely an 'inertial force', but that shouldn't be a problem. Somebody on a spinning disc can also compare the centrifugal force he/she is measuring with the gravitational force she is undergoing, do the corresponding math and compare the two.
 
Of course you can compare the forces but since the mechanisms behind the forces are completely different I don’t understand why we need an answer to why the gravitational force is so much weaker than the other fundamental forces. If the gravitational force were in the same order of magnitude as the electromagnetic force in strength I think it would be an incredible coincidence.
If there was a graviton, carrying the force the same way as photons do with the electromagnetic force, I would have understood the concept of finding out what causes the forces to be so different in strength but since those forces work in a completely different way I don’t understand why we need an additional explanation, like gravity propagating in extra dimensions.
 
First, the forces are what they are, irrespective of our models. An airplane is faster than a snail, even though they are totally different objects moving in totally different ways. Yes, gravity can break your leg, but it takes a whole planet to do it. That's pretty weak.

Second, the fact that our best mathematical models of gravity don't look anything like our best mathematical models of other forces may or may not be telling us there are fundamentally different. The map is not the territory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, DennisN, weirdoguy and 1 other person
Vanadium 50 said:
Yes, gravity can break your leg, but it takes a whole planet to do it. That's pretty weak.
That's the most vivid demonstration of the weakness of gravity I ever seen. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K