Particle Is Griffiths Introduction to Elementary Particles up to date?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" (1st Edition, 1987) is generally considered a solid entry-level text, despite its age. While it lacks updates on significant developments in particle physics, such as neutrino oscillations, the foundational concepts remain relevant for beginners. The book's strengths are highlighted, particularly in comparison to Griffiths' other works, making it a recommended choice for those new to the field. However, for advanced topics like neutrino masses, supplementary texts such as Blinky's "Lecture Note of Physics" are suggested for a more comprehensive understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of particle physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of neutrino oscillations
  • Awareness of quantum field theory (QFT)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest developments in neutrino physics
  • Explore Blinky's "Lecture Note of Physics" for advanced topics
  • Study the confirmation of the Higgs boson and its implications
  • Learn about quantum field theory (QFT) applications in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on particle physics, as well as anyone seeking foundational knowledge in the subject.

kmm
Messages
188
Reaction score
15
I have a copy of Griffiths Introduction to Elementary Particles (1st Edition) and was thinking of beginning to work through it. I was curious if anyone knows if this text is sufficiently up to date or if there have been any major developments in particle physics that would make it worth getting a different text. The only thing I'm aware of is that in the 2nd edition, there is an added chapter on neutrino oscillations. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No textbook will be up to date. Research is going on all the time.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and dextercioby
Vanadium 50 said:
No textbook will be up to date. Research is going on all the time.

Right, I wouldn't expect any book to be 100% up to date. But this book was published in 1987, so I wasn't sure if this book is so significantly outdated that there are a lot of glaring problems with it that it would be best for me to just find a new book. I also wasn't sure, being this is an "entry level" book on the topic, if the topics he covers have essentially remained unchanged since it was published.
 
Read the title: "Introduction to...". So the delevopments over the last 30 years (out of which the confirmation of the Higgs boson beats them all as relevance) should not matter to a beginner.

This is his best written textbook, even though his QM one is more famous and used in American schools.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and kmm
dextercioby said:
Read the title: "Introduction to...". So the delevopments over the last 30 years (out of which the confirmation of the Higgs boson beats them all as relevance) should not matter to a beginner.

This is his best written textbook, even though his QM one is more famous and used in American schools.

I suspected that. Thanks for the feedback!
 
Well his QM book is not too good, judged from the many confused students asking about it in the quantum forum. I like his E&M textbook very much but don't know his particle physics book very well, but it seems to be pretty good too.

Concerning "up to date". I would say, an HEP book is pretty likely to be up to date. After all the Standard Model is over 40 years old now and still the best theory ever. The only established fact beyond it are neutrino masses and oscillations, and about this I've not seen a complete textbook description yet. There are too many hand-waving arguments around. The best textbook concerning that topic I know of is Blinky's "Lecture Note of Physics" volume about it, though as far as I can see, it also lacks the complete description, which can only be to describe the complete creation and detection process with QFT, see, e.g.,

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9545-4
 
  • Like
Likes kmm
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K