Is Heat Transfer between 2 Walls Independent of Temperature Assumptions?

AI Thread Summary
Heat transfer between two walls can be analyzed without specific temperature assumptions if the positive direction for heat flux is clearly defined. The equations governing heat transfer remain valid regardless of temperature values, provided the flow direction is established from wall 2 to wall 1. This approach allows for a more flexible analysis of heat transfer scenarios. The discussion emphasizes the importance of defining direction in heat transfer calculations. Overall, the clarification enhances understanding of heat transfer principles.
Shreya
Messages
187
Reaction score
64
Homework Statement
Please refer the image
I am not sure if my solution is right, especially about the steady state condition. Am I allowed to assume T' > T1? Or should I consider 2 opposite heat fluxes and figure out their difference
Please be kind to help
Relevant Equations
-
The question & my solution
 

Attachments

  • 20220211_061011.jpg
    20220211_061011.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 117
  • 20220211_061254.jpg
    20220211_061254.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 122
Physics news on Phys.org
That all looks right.
##T'>T_1## is a perfectly reasonable assumption, but it does not need to be an assumption if the positive direction for the heat transfer fluxes is defined (rather than taking it be a non-negative quantity). Your equations are valid regardless of the values of the temperatures if the positive flow direction is defined to be from external wall 2 to external wall 1.
 
haruspex said:
That all looks right.
##T'>T_1## is a perfectly reasonable assumption, but it does not need to be an assumption if the positive direction for the heat transfer fluxes is defined (rather than taking it be a non-negative quantity). Your equations are valid regardless of the values of the temperatures if the positive flow direction is defined to be from external wall 2 to external wall 1.
Thank You! That has really helped @haruspex
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top