Is Heat Transfer between 2 Walls Independent of Temperature Assumptions?

AI Thread Summary
Heat transfer between two walls can be analyzed without specific temperature assumptions if the positive direction for heat flux is clearly defined. The equations governing heat transfer remain valid regardless of temperature values, provided the flow direction is established from wall 2 to wall 1. This approach allows for a more flexible analysis of heat transfer scenarios. The discussion emphasizes the importance of defining direction in heat transfer calculations. Overall, the clarification enhances understanding of heat transfer principles.
Shreya
Messages
187
Reaction score
64
Homework Statement
Please refer the image
I am not sure if my solution is right, especially about the steady state condition. Am I allowed to assume T' > T1? Or should I consider 2 opposite heat fluxes and figure out their difference
Please be kind to help
Relevant Equations
-
The question & my solution
 

Attachments

  • 20220211_061011.jpg
    20220211_061011.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 118
  • 20220211_061254.jpg
    20220211_061254.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 122
Physics news on Phys.org
That all looks right.
##T'>T_1## is a perfectly reasonable assumption, but it does not need to be an assumption if the positive direction for the heat transfer fluxes is defined (rather than taking it be a non-negative quantity). Your equations are valid regardless of the values of the temperatures if the positive flow direction is defined to be from external wall 2 to external wall 1.
 
haruspex said:
That all looks right.
##T'>T_1## is a perfectly reasonable assumption, but it does not need to be an assumption if the positive direction for the heat transfer fluxes is defined (rather than taking it be a non-negative quantity). Your equations are valid regardless of the values of the temperatures if the positive flow direction is defined to be from external wall 2 to external wall 1.
Thank You! That has really helped @haruspex
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top