Is Inequality Proven Using Calculus in a Different Approach?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality $\sin x + 2x \geq \frac{3x(x+1)}{\pi}$ for all $x \in \left[0, \frac{\pi}{2}\right]$ can be proven using calculus by analyzing the function $f(x) = \sin(x) + 2x - \frac{3x(x+1)}{\pi}$. The critical point near $0.88$ and the endpoints of the interval are essential for determining the minimum value of $f(x)$. The second derivative test confirms that $f''(x) < 0$, indicating that $f(x)$ is concave, and the evaluations at $f(0) = 0$ and $f(\pi/2) > 0$ establish that $f(x) > 0$ throughout the interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically derivatives and concavity
  • Familiarity with Taylor Series expansions, particularly for $\sin(x)$
  • Knowledge of critical points and their significance in function analysis
  • Ability to evaluate functions at specific points within an interval
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the second derivative test in function analysis
  • Learn about Taylor Series and their role in approximating functions
  • Explore concavity and its implications for function behavior
  • Investigate other methods for proving inequalities using calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of inequalities and function analysis using calculus techniques.

juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Prove that $\displaystyle \sin x+2x \geq \frac{3x(x+1)}{\pi}\forall x\in \left[0,\frac{\pi}{2}\right]$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm tempted to "use calculus" to produce the Taylor Series for f(x) = sin(x) and then observe that:

\sin(x) &lt; x - \frac{x^{3}}{6}
 
I think I would approach it this way: minimize the function
$$f(x)=\sin(x)+2x-\frac{3x(x+1)}{\pi}$$
on the interval $[0,\pi/2]$ using the standard calculus techniques. There's one critical point near $0.88$, and then you have the endpoints. The left endpoint, I think, will end up being the smallest point on the graph. The second derivative might come in handy.
 
Here is a slightly different approach.

Using f(x) as defined in post #3, show that \( f''(x) < 0 \) for all x, so f is concave. By computation, show that \( f(0) = 0 \) and \( f(\pi / 2) > 0 \). This is enough to conclude that \( f(x) > 0 \) on \( [0 , \pi/2] \).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K