Is Infimum of Non-Negative Measurable Functions Non-Negative Almost Everywhere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinsing
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 3K views
jinsing
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If {f_n} is a collection of measurable functions defined on R and satisfying: |f_n(x)|<= 1 for all n in N and x in R and f_n(x) >=0 almost everywhere on R for all n in N and f(x) = inf{f_n(x)|n in N}, then f(x) >= 0 almost everywhere on R.


Homework Equations



Almost everywhere, sequences of functions, measurability


The Attempt at a Solution



Assume {f_n} is a collection of measurable functions defined on R satisfying the criteria above. Since for all n in N f_n(x) >= 0 a.e on R, define S_n = {x | f_n(x) < 0}. Then by definition for all n in N m(S_n) = 0. Now let [tex]S = \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty S_n.[/tex] Since S is the union of several sets S_n with measure of zero, then m(S) = 0. So, we know f(x) = inf{f_n(x) | n in N} >= 0 for all x in R-S. But m(S) = 0, so f(x) >= 0 almost everywhere, as desired.

I'm wondering if I can necessarily state that the inf of the f_n's will be >= 0. I'm not that great at catching little details like that, so having someone give the proof a quick look-over would be incredibly helpful.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It helps to clarify things if you fix x to be a specific value, say b. If [itex]f_n(b) \geq[/itex] for all values of n, then is [itex]\inf\{f_n(b)} \geq 0[/itex]? This follows immediately from the definition of infimum.

Then conclude that S can only consist of values of x for which at least one fn(x)<0