Is Information Really Preserved in Quantum Systems?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LightningInAJar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of information preservation in quantum systems, specifically addressing whether information can be lost or destroyed. It references Stephen Hawking's contributions and highlights the complexity of definitions surrounding information in physics. The conversation touches on Maxwell's demon and the implications of black holes on thermodynamics and information theory. Ultimately, it concludes that while common definitions of information may suggest loss, the underlying physics supports the conservation of information at a fundamental level.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with thermodynamics and information theory
  • Knowledge of unitary operators in quantum systems
  • Basic comprehension of black hole physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Maxwell's demon and information theory" for foundational concepts
  • Explore "unitary operators in quantum mechanics" to understand information preservation
  • Investigate "black hole thermodynamics" and its implications on information loss
  • Study "open quantum systems" to grasp non-unitary dynamics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the intersection of information theory and thermodynamics.

LightningInAJar
Messages
273
Reaction score
36
TL;DR
What physics states that information isn't lost or destroyed?
I don't know what category this fits in but how conclusive is it that information can't be lost or destroyed? Is this mostly just Stephen Hawking talking or do others support this idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually on questions like this, things are much clearer for everyone if you cite a specific article about your question(s). Take this a friendly notification. Right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Doc Al and berkeman
That article is too complex for me. I mean with perfect math we can calculate all that came before the current moment. Even if matter fell into a black hole at some point.
 
If I send a radio message from Earth, it will spread out in space and after a certain time will become weaker than the background noise. Then it is lost.
 
LightningInAJar said:
That article is too complex for me.
OK, then try this simplified version.

There are many definitions of the word information.

When physicists say that information is conserved (can't be destroyed), they mean the boring definitions that you don't understand.

All of the common definitions of information that you do understand are things that are not conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
LightningInAJar said:
Summary:: What physics states that information isn't lost or destroyed?

I don't know what category this fits in but how conclusive is it that information can't be lost or destroyed? Is this mostly just Stephen Hawking talking or do others support this idea?

The idea has slowly crawled into physics, starting maybe from this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon

-----

If a demon has a container of warm gas, a winch and a black hole, the demon may lower the container into the black hole and get the energy contained in the motion of the gas molecules. And that is some kind of a problem for thermodynamics and information theory.
 
tech99 said:
If I send a radio message from Earth, it will spread out in space and after a certain time will become weaker than the background noise. Then it is lost.
Isn't the background noise also information? And with God sized means couldn't even that we filtered out?
 
Most theoretical models of quantum systems assume that the wave function evolves according to a unitary operator, and this approach is supported at a fundamental level by essentially all experimental observations where unitarity is relevant (i.e. it generally isn't supported or refuted by experiments that involve open quantum systems, or where the detailed behavior of all outgoing products of the system of interest isn't important, e.g. when verifying Planck's law of black body radiation.) Moreover, all experimental studies of open quantum systems (or experiments that address questions where it isn't necessary to measure a complete set of observables) are consistent with the non-unitary dynamics of a reduced (incomplete) system induced by unitary dynamics of a ('complete') wave function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K