Is It Acceptable to Use Angle Braces in Vector Integration?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Using angle braces, such as ∫ dx, for vector integration is not a widely accepted practice in mathematical literature. Traditional notation, which expresses vectors in terms of unit vectors like ∫ [xi + 2xj + 3xk] dx, is preferred due to established conventions in both mathematics and physics. The discussion highlights that while angle braces may offer convenience, they lack formal recognition in textbooks, suggesting that adherence to conventional notation is advisable for clarity and consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus
  • Familiarity with integration techniques
  • Knowledge of unit vector notation
  • Awareness of mathematical conventions in literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formal definitions of vector functions in calculus
  • Study the differences between mathematical and physical notation for vectors
  • Explore examples of vector integration in standard textbooks
  • Learn about the implications of notation on clarity in mathematical communication
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are looking to deepen their understanding of vector integration and the importance of notation conventions.

radiogaga35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
A quick question -- is it acceptable to use angle braces when integrating a vector function, instead of expressing the vector i.t.o unit vectors?

E.g. say ∫<x,2x,3x> dx

This form seems far more convenient and suggestive than ∫ [xi + 2xj + 3xk] dx. Especially with ugly functions. However I've looked though a few textbooks and I've never seen this notation used with integration (or differentiation?) of a vector fxn...is there some reason, or is it just convention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is there some reason, or is it just convention?

I suspect it is just convention. Math texts tend to use (a,b,c) while physics texts tend toward the i,j,k unit vector notation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K