Is it possible? (faster than light in a medium)

In summary: If we have a tank which full of water.Then,emitted the light into the tank.The speed of light is c/n . If we can run faster than c/n. We will run faster than light.Is it possible?In summary, if we have a tank which is full of water and emit light into it, the speed of light will be c/n. However, if we can run faster than c/n, we will be running faster than light.
  • #1
IPhO' 2008
44
0
If we have a tank which full of water.Then,emitted the light into the tank.The speed of light is c/n . If we can run faster than c/n. We will run faster than light.
Is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Yes, the impossibility of traveling faster than light only applies to the speed of light in a vacuum.
 
  • #3


IPhO' 2008 said:
If we have a tank which full of water.Then,emitted the light into the tank.The speed of light is c/n . If we can run faster than c/n. We will run faster than light.
Is it possible?

You are gauging the speed of light I assume from one medium to another.

It will max out at c.
 
  • #4


Well, we can't run faster than the speed of light in water, but hypothetically, if there is a material with a refractive index that causes light to travel at an apparent speed less than running speed, we could run faster.
 
  • #5


russ_watters said:
Well, we can't run faster than the speed of light in water, but hypothetically, if there is a material with a refractive index that causes light to travel at an apparent speed less than running speed, we could run faster.

http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/02.18/light.html
 
  • #6


IPhO' 2008 said:
If we have a tank which full of water.Then,emitted the light into the tank.The speed of light is c/n . If we can run faster than c/n. We will run faster than light.
Is it possible?

Instead of us running, use an electron moving through the water. If the election moves faster that the speed of light in the water, Cerenkov radiation is emitted. This radiation is routinely observed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
 
  • #7
Thread title edited. Please make thread titles specific to begin with.
 
  • #8
We can run faster than c/n in lab,but we can't run faster than c/n in the water.
Right?
 

FAQ: Is it possible? (faster than light in a medium)

Is it possible for anything to travel faster than the speed of light in a medium?

According to our current understanding of physics, it is not possible for anything to travel faster than the speed of light in a medium. This is because the speed of light is considered to be the maximum speed at which energy, matter, and information can travel in the universe.

Can anything travel faster than light in a medium in a vacuum?

No, the speed of light in a vacuum is considered to be the ultimate speed limit in the universe. This means that nothing, including light itself, can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.

Are there any exceptions to the rule that nothing can travel faster than light in a medium?

Some theories have proposed the existence of hypothetical particles called tachyons, which are thought to travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. However, there is currently no experimental evidence to support the existence of tachyons.

How does the speed of light in a medium compare to the speed of light in a vacuum?

The speed of light in a medium is always slower than the speed of light in a vacuum. This is because light travels through a medium by interacting with the atoms and particles in that medium, which slows it down.

Could future advancements in technology allow for faster-than-light travel in a medium?

While it is currently not possible, it is always possible that future advancements in technology and our understanding of physics could lead to new discoveries and breakthroughs that may allow for faster-than-light travel in a medium. However, this is purely speculative and would require a significant shift in our current understanding of the laws of physics.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
736
Replies
1
Views
801
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
98
Views
5K
Back
Top