Is It Possible to Have an Imaginary Normalisation Constant?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of a wavefunction in a one-dimensional quantum system, specifically addressing the normalization constant C for a linear combination of energy eigenfunctions Q1 and Q2. The original poster questions the possibility of C being imaginary.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the normalization constant C and expresses confusion regarding the implications of an imaginary value for C. Participants question the formulation of the product of the wavefunction and its complex conjugate, and explore the properties of energy eigenstates, including orthogonality and linear superposition.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the definitions and properties of the wavefunctions involved. There is a focus on clarifying the mathematical relationships and assumptions, particularly regarding the orthogonality of the eigenfunctions and the implications for the normalization constant.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the correct formulation of the normalization condition and the implications of having an imaginary normalization constant. The participants are considering the properties of the wavefunctions and the assumptions underlying the normalization process.

Ruddiger27
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A one-dimensional system is in a state at time t=0 represented by:

Q(x) = C { (1.6^0.5)Q1(x) - (2.4^0.5)Q2(x)}

Where Qn(x) are normalised eergy eigenfunctions corresponding to different energy eigenvalues, En(n=1,2)

Obtain the normalisation constant C


The Attempt at a Solution



I get C= i(1.2)^0.5 from the following equation:

C^2 * (1.6 (int( Q1 ^2 dx) - 2.4(int ( Q2 ^2 dx = 1

So C^2 has to be -5/4 in order for the above to be true. Is this right?
Just a bit confused over whether it's possible to have an imaginary value for the normalisation constant? Thanks for any help you can give.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't formed the product Q(x)Q*(x) correctly. What is special about energy eigenstates?
 
they follow linear superposition? so the integral of the total wavefunction squared is equal to the integral of 1.6*Q1^2 plus the integral of 2.4*Q2^2?
 
What is Q* equal to ? How do you define the scalar product?

Daniel.
 
Well there aren't any imaginary parts to the first wavefunction since its just in the form Q = C ( XQ1 - YQ2) so Q* is just the same as Q.
 
Ruddiger27 said:
they follow linear superposition?
What do you know about the integral of Q1Q2*?

so the integral of the total wavefunction squared is equal to the integral of 1.6*Q1^2 plus the integral of 2.4*Q2^2?
Yes. Are you absolutely clear why this is so?
 
I would think the integral of Q1Q2* would be zero since these wavefunctions are orthogonal, so I would end up with C^2 =5/20.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K