Expectation Value of Momentum for Wavepacket

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
torq123
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the average momentum for a packet corresponding to this normalizable wavefunction?

[itex]\Psi(x) = C \phi(x) exp(ikx)[/itex]

C is a normalization constant and [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] is a real function.

Homework Equations


[itex]\hat{p}\rightarrow -i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]\int\Psi(x)^{*}\Psi(x)dx = \int C^2 \phi(x)^{2}dx= 1[/itex]

Plugging in the momentum operator and using the chain rule:

[itex]<\hat{p}> = \hbar k \int C^2 \phi(x)^2 dx - i \hbar \int C^2 \phi^{'}\phi dx[/itex]

The second term is always imaginary since [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] is real, so I said the momentum is [itex]\hbar k[/itex] which I think might be right, but for the wrong reasons? I didn't think Hermetian operators could give imaginary expectation values...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
torq123 said:
[itex]<\hat{p}> = \hbar k \int C^2 \phi(x)^2 dx - i \hbar \int C^2 \phi^{'}\phi dx[/itex]

The second term is always imaginary since [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] is real, so I said the momentum is [itex]\hbar k[/itex] which I think might be right, but for the wrong reasons? I didn't think Hermetian operators could give imaginary expectation values...
Try working on the 2nd term a bit more. Hint: use integration by parts.
 
Are you saying that the second term must be zero since [itex]\phi[/itex] vanishes at ±∞ and the integral evaluates to [itex]\phi^2(x)/2[/itex]? That makes sense to me.
 
torq123 said:
Are you saying that the second term must be zero since [itex]\phi[/itex] vanishes at ±∞ and the integral evaluates to [itex]\phi^2(x)/2[/itex]?
That's the idea.
 
Awesome. Thanks for the help.