Is it possible to propel a spray can with gunpowder?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using gunpowder or similar substances to pressurize a spray can for high-pressure applications. Participants explore various methods of propulsion, safety concerns, and alternative technologies, focusing on both theoretical and practical aspects of the design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that gunpowder could generate sufficient gas for pressurizing a spray can, but express concerns about safety and reliability.
  • Others compare the proposed design to airbag technology, highlighting the potential hazards involved.
  • One participant mentions fire extinguishers as a reference for pressurization methods, while another proposes using CO2 cartridges as a safer alternative.
  • There are suggestions to consider the specific application and requirements for the spray, including droplet size, distance, and liquid properties.
  • Some participants caution against using gunpowder due to the high pressures involved and share personal experiences with high-pressure systems and their dangers.
  • A few participants propose alternative ignition methods, such as using match heads, and discuss the importance of nozzle design in achieving desired spray patterns.
  • Concerns are raised about the destructive potential of using gunpowder, with references to the risks of explosions and injuries associated with high-pressure applications.
  • One participant humorously speculates about the potential distance a can could be propelled, while another counters with practical observations about the limitations of such designs.
  • Links to external resources on aerosol propellants and historical gunpowder engines are provided for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the use of gunpowder for pressurizing a spray can, with significant disagreement on its safety and effectiveness. There is no consensus on the best approach, and multiple competing ideas are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various limitations, including the need for careful consideration of pressure requirements, the properties of the liquid being sprayed, and the design of the spray nozzle. Concerns about safety and the potential for dangerous outcomes are emphasized, particularly regarding the use of gunpowder.

GulfOnBoard
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Is it possible to propell a spray can with gunpowder?
Is it possible to pressurize a spray can with gunpowder or something similar, in order to make a reliable spray can with high pressure?

I’m asking this question because a small amount of gunpowder generates a huge amount of propelling gasses when ignited. I need to make a compact spray can, and I don’t want to store the can pressurized but instead pressurize it at the moment when I’ll use it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like cars' airbag tech. Their 'gas generator' is far from benign. Due Care, Please ??
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker, berkeman, anorlunda and 1 other person
GulfOnBoard said:
I need to make a compact spray can, and I don’t want to store the can pressurized but instead pressurize it at the moment when I’ll use it.
Look at how some fire extinguishers work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137 and anorlunda
Have you considered a pump sprayer? Always works, never loses pressure, zero volume taken up by pressurizing substance, safer, and better for the environment.
 
jrmichler said:
Have you considered a pump sprayer? Always works, never loses pressure, zero volume taken up by pressurizing substance, safer, and better for the environment.
Do you mean a water pump/electrical enginge? I haven’t seen any such device for high pressure that’s small.
If you mean this: EB882C59-2CA4-42A1-8463-FE3DEA747D32.jpegkind of pump sprays, they are not powerful enough, I want the spray can to be equivalent to a highly pressurized fire extinguisher.

Will this design work?
7336BCD2-6323-4A5F-89FF-4902A9675244.jpeg

If I use modern (smokeless) gunpowder the pressure will be way too high and the spray can will deliver the liquid like a shot. If I use black powder, even though it generates lower pressure than modern smokeless propellant, I still believe that it will also burn way to fast for this application.

A slower burning powder, like those used in model rocketry, may work better?

(The design above need a source of ignition and a vent hole for the burning gasses to escape through, which I did not include in the picture)
 
Last edited:
That's basically a cannon with a restricted muzzle. Sure, it could work, if your intent is to empty the whole can. What's the application for this? Your initial post said "reliable", and I'm not sure this will be.

I think a better approach would be to use one of those small pressurized CO2 cartridges like what's used in paintball guns. Just one of them can inflate a bicycle tire to 100 psi. That should be more than enough pressure for your spray can. Because they are threaded, they are easy to replace.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213 and jbriggs444
Anachronist said:
What's the application for this?
I think that's a key question for the OP to answer. There are just too many possibilities to consider unless we know the constraints of the problem.
 
Perhaps a match head or a few of them. Wrap a lamp filiment around them to ignite. It would take some experimenting... be carefull.
 
What kind of spray pattern? How far does it need to spray? Is there a flow volume requirement? Is the liquid water? If not, what is the viscosity and surface tension? What droplet size do you want? The design of your spray nozzle has a huge effect on the pressure needed to spray a certain distance. If you only need to spray a liquid with properties similar to water a distance of 20 feet, and do it with large droplets, then a pump sprayer with a properly designed nozzle will do the job.

I once made a simple nozzle with a 0.040" diameter hole for the end of a garden hose. At about 50 PSI, it would shoot a stream over the roof of the house. It was dangerous. It felt like that small diameter solid stream could puncture my skin, so I destroyed it.

I then made another nozzle. This one had a 0.040" diameter orifice aimed at a plate at about a 15 degree angle. That made a fan spray with impressive range and no danger of puncturing skin. It was a way for my daughter to play with a hose without wasting much water.

Design the nozzle first, then determine what pressure and flow rate you need to get the spray you want.

A pinhole hydraulic leak in a logging machine hit one of my uncles on a finger tip, and injected hydraulic fluid all the up to his elbow. He was lucky, the doctors were able to save his arm and hand, but that arm and hand were permanently partly crippled. Mobil hydraulic systems typically run at about 2,000 PSI. The paper mill had a high pressure water system for high pressure washing of machinery. That system ran at 1000 PSI. The safety training including cutting a wood 2 X 4 (50 by 100 mm) in half with the wash gun, followed by the announcement that any horseplay would result in immediate termination of employment.

Stay away from gunpowder. Smokeless powder regularly burns at 50,000 PSI, black powder at pressures over 5,000 PSI. Run some tests, find what pressure you really need, and think very carefully before designing anything that needs more than 100 PSI.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #10
I keep looking at the title and think "I bet I could get the can flying a couple hundred feet..."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds, Bystander and davenn
  • #12
Vanadium 50 said:
I keep looking at the title and think "I bet I could get the can flying a couple hundred feet..."
Don't bet any money on that. Setting a can on the muzzle of a cannon pointed straight up gets the can pieces to a maximum of treetop height. It makes no difference whether it's a small pop can or a gallon can. The can gets ripped into several pieces that quickly orient into the maximum drag orientation, so they do not go far. Wood chunks from a wood cable spool go farther. And it's dangerous - those sheet metal pieces have sharp edges.

Gunpowder does not work for can rockets. Smokeless powder, if not confined, burns with a fiery WHOOSH. Black powder explodes even it it's not confined.

BTW, when my father died, I got rid of 30 lbs of smokeless gunpowder. Make a pile, added a powder train, threw in a match, and it was gone with a WHOOSH. But not an explosion. My father tried that with one pound of black powder. It was a good thing that he had a fuse long enough to get well away because anybody close would have been hospitalized.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
17K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K