Is it Possible to Separate Oxygen from Air Using Centrifugal Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JonPriluck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Separation
Click For Summary
Separating oxygen from atmospheric air using centrifugal force in a practical, continuous process is deemed unfeasible due to the extremely high accelerations required. Current methods, like gas centrifuges, operate in batch processes and cannot achieve the necessary velocities of over 1 km/s for effective separation. Innovative concepts, such as using a nano-vortex or MEMS devices, are discussed, but their practicality remains uncertain. The complexity of creating a system that efficiently extracts oxygen for applications like air-breathing rocket propulsion is acknowledged, with cooling methods being a more viable alternative for separation. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, significant physical and engineering challenges hinder its realization.
JonPriluck
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to separate out the oxygen from atmospheric air by centrifugal force. I am not asking theoretically but practically. In other words is there any device that will act as a gas centrifuge which can separate air molecules in real time? A continuous process as opposed to a batch method.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nothing that would be practical, no. The required accelerations are simply too high.
 
cji, I tend to agree with you on conventional approaches but I like to think outside the box. For example, what about a nano-vortex? The laws of physics change with scale, what isn't possible in the macro world might be possible in the micro world. Perhaps we could imagine a MEMS (Micro Electric Mechanical Systems) device that would suck in air and form a microscopic tornado, maybe then the molecules would behave differently?

The reason I ask is I have this idea about an air breathing rocket propulsion system. In order for it to work you have to somehow get the oxygen out of the atmosphere without all the nitrogen, water, and CO2. The method of fractionating the air would have to be very efficient to serve this purpose. If anyone is interested in this idea you can look at the attachment.

Remember, it's just a concept. Which isn't even an idea. I suspect the complexity of it is too much toever be reduced to practice. But you can't blame me for thinking about it :^) Physics is fun.
 

Attachments

The relevant quantity for the separation power is the kinetic energy of the outer molecules (from the rotation), multiplied with the relative mass difference, relative to their thermal energy. To get a noticable separation, this value should be of the order of 1. For air at room temperature, this needs a velocity of >1km/s or >3 times the speed of sound. The size of the system does not matter, but 1km/s in a microscopic device does not look feasible.
Cooling is easier - the different components will condense at different temperatures.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K