Is it too hard "God Created the Integers"?

  • Context: Foundations 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gjmdp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Integers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the accessibility and difficulty of Stephen Hawking's book "God Created the Integers," which compiles significant works in mathematics and philosophy. Participants explore whether the book is too challenging for readers, particularly those with a basic understanding of multivariable calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while the book is intended as a popularization, it includes works that are not easily accessible to the general public, such as those by Gauss, Riemann, and Gödel.
  • There is a question about the meaning of the term "divulgative," with some participants attempting to clarify its usage and relevance in the context of the book.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the appropriateness of the term "divulgative" as an adjective derived from "divulge," questioning its clarity and meaning.
  • Another participant indicates a desire for further explanation from the original poster regarding their use of the term.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to have differing views on the accessibility of the book and the meaning of specific terminology, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the audience's background knowledge and the nature of the works cited in Hawking's book, which may not be universally understood.

Gjmdp
Messages
147
Reaction score
5
This Stephen Hawking book gathers the most important books along human history. In theory, this book is just divulgative, but, Gäuss, Riemann, Gödel... books included in Hawking's are not meant to be divulgative. So, any of you who read the book(/books if separeted) think it's maybe too hard. PD: I've got some basics on Multivariable Calculus, not much far away from that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gjmdp said:
This Stephen Hawking book gathers the most important books along human history. In theory, this book is just divulgative, but, Gäuss, Riemann, Gödel... books included in Hawking's are not meant to be divulgative. So, any of you who read the book(/books if separeted) think it's maybe too hard. PD: I've got some basics on Multivariable Calculus, not much far away from that.
What does that word mean in English?
 
I may be completely off-track here, but from the context it seems like he means the Hawking book is a popularization but the bibliography lists book that are not popularized for the masses.
 
smodak said:
I may be completely off-track here, but from the context it seems like he means the Hawking book is a popularization but the bibliography lists book that are not popularized for the masses.
Well, we could guess about it forever. Maybe he'll answer my question and we won't have to.
 
phinds said:
What does that word mean in English?

That's an attempt to make an adjective from divulge.
 
martinbn said:
That's an attempt to make an adjective from divulge.
Perhaps, but if so I fail to see how it makes sense. Why are we guessing about this? @Gjmdp how about you explain what you are talking about?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
14K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K