Is it wise to take Molecular Biology without taking Genetics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the suitability of taking a molecular biology course after only completing a biochemistry course, without prior genetics coursework. Participants highlight that while biochemistry provides a foundation in biological macromolecules, molecular biology focuses on the mechanisms of replication, transcription, and translation, which are closely tied to genetics. They emphasize that having a background in genetics would be beneficial, as instructors may assume students have that knowledge, potentially making it challenging to follow along. The original poster has received clearance to take molecular biology after biochemistry, despite not having taken genetics, and is advised to consult with professors for guidance. Additionally, reviewing a genetics textbook is suggested as a way to familiarize oneself with essential concepts and terminology before the course begins. Overall, the consensus is that while it may be possible to succeed in molecular biology without genetics, having some foundational knowledge would be advantageous.
AstroWave
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm not too sure if this is the correct subforum to post this question in.

Anyways I have taken Biochemistry only. I signed up to take molecular biology and I'm wondering if that is a bad idea with no previous coursework taken in genetics (the only biology college course I have taken is biochemistry). These courses are lower division courses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At my university, genetics and cell bio are prerequisites for molecular bio. With that being said, biochem will help depending on the depth of the course you took but keep in mind that biochem is not truly a biology course. While biochem focuses more on the structure and function of biological macromolecules in general, molecular biology is more focused on the mechanisms behind replication, transcription, and translation of RNA and the eventual production of proteins. A background knowledge of genetics will certainly help but you may be able to pick it up as you go. Also you may get into some trouble if you are not familiar with some of the cellular mechanisms. Does the course list any prerequisites?
 
It's possible to learn molecular biology without knowing genetics. However, what's possible (even likely) is that your teachers are going to assume you've taken a genetics course, which makes it harder for you to keep track of what they're saying: if they're going to use examples of molecular biology in genetics, you're going to be all "ehwat?"

Seriously though, why don't you just ask a teacher or professor at your college? It's as simple as asking "will I be able to keep up if I haven't taken a genetics course, and are there any genetics-y things I absolutely need to know?" Most teachers will be glad to help you out.
 
Thank you for the response jbrussell93,

At my school Genetics, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology are offered in a series (in that order). The prereq for Biochemistry is genetics and the preq for Molecular Biology is Biochemistry. However I was able to get clearance to take Biochemistry without taking genetics as a prereq. With that being said I am able to take Molecular Biology since I have taken the prereq course (Biochemistry). Sorry if that sounds confusing. I hope you understand.

Hobin: I sent out an email a few days ago and now I'm waiting for a reply. Thank you for your insight.
 
Last edited:
AstroWave said:
At my school Genetics, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology are offered in a series (in that order). The prereq for Biochemistry is genetics and the preq for Molecular Biology is Biochemistry. However I was able to get clearance to take Biochemistry without taking genetics as a prereq. With that being said I am able to take Molecular Biology since I have taken the prereq course (Biochemistry). Sorry if that sounds confusing. I hope you understand.

Actually, that is similar to the way my school works. The difference is that our sequence goes genetics, cell bio, molecular bio. Genetics is the prerequisite for cell bio and cell bio is the prerequisite for molecular bio.

Since biochemistry is actually part of the "sequence" then you should probably be fine. I'm guessing that since it is the prerequisite, they covered more relevant material to molecular bio than the average biochem course. If genetics was the prereq for biochem and you did well in biochem then you should be fine going on to molecular bio. I would also say that it would be a good idea to ask the professor what they think but I imagine that there won't be a problem. If you're still worried, you might look for a cheap used genetics book and read through it. This will give you an idea of what you need to refresh on and will at least familiarize you with the terms you may hear in lecture. Also, it will be a good reference once you're actually in the molecular bio class.

Good Luck!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top