Is Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics a Good Resource for Self-Study?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suitability of J.D. Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" as a resource for self-study, particularly for students beginning their journey in electrodynamics. Participants share their experiences and opinions regarding the text's accessibility and effectiveness for learning the subject.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Jackson's text is widely used and has mixed reviews, with some recalling positive experiences while others express dissatisfaction.
  • One participant argues that the book is not suitable for self-study, suggesting that it often requires supplementary resources for clarification on omitted derivations and concepts.
  • Another participant emphasizes that Jackson's book compresses undergraduate electrostatics material, indicating it is more appropriate for graduate-level courses rather than beginners.
  • A participant mentions having access to a collection of physics books from a late relative, suggesting they may seek alternative resources for learning electrodynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" is not ideal for self-study, particularly for those new to the subject. However, there is no consensus on whether it is a valuable resource overall, as experiences vary widely.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the text's omission of certain derivations and concepts, which may pose challenges for self-learners. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and opinions without resolving the overall effectiveness of the book.

ziad1985
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
The short version:I'm taking Classical electrodynamics this semester, I found out that I have this book:
Classical Electrodynamics by J.D.Jackson
Anyone know this book?Would it be a good choice to help me study?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, many folks have studied from this text... some with fond memories.. others, not so fond.
 
It's one of those texts that can be either good or bad, but you're probably stuck with it since it's so widely used.

From my experience with the text, I can safely say that it's not made for self-study. You will find yourself often looking to outside resources for clarification on certain derivations/concepts that Jackson omits. Also, some of the problems are very difficult (but that's what this forum is for, right? :biggrin:)
 
I'm not really stuck with it, I just have it...
It's not for self study, Like I said I just started taking the courses and saw that I have this Book..
My late uncle was a science book collector, in his library there is a few thousand books raging from biology to particle physics(I don't know why he collected them)anyway they are all mine(stuff related to physics), I'll see if I find other books on the same subject..
 
Last edited:
here's a list:
 
ziad1985 said:
I'm not really stuck with it, I just have it...
It's not for self study, Like I said I just started taking the courses and saw that I have this Book..
My late uncle was a science book collector, in his library there is a few thousand books raging from biology to particle physics(I don't know why he collected them)anyway they are all mine(stuff related to physics), I'll see if I find other books on the same subject..

Er.. if you are just starting to learn E&M, that book is not something you want to use. All the stuff you learn in undergraduate electrostatics is compressed into Jackson's Introduction! So it is not a good book to start learning E&M from. Jackson's book tends to be used in graduate level E&M courses.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K