Is Kinetic Energy Really Constant in Constant Velocity Motion?

Click For Summary
Kinetic energy remains constant during constant velocity motion, indicating that the net work done on the object is zero. However, when an object moves upward at constant velocity, its gravitational potential energy (g.p.e) increases despite no change in kinetic energy. This occurs because the positive work done to lift the object is balanced by the negative work done by gravity. The energy transferred in lifting the object is stored as g.p.e. Understanding this balance clarifies the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in such scenarios.
Muhammad asad
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am really confused here. I have studied that if the kinetic energy of a moving body is not changing then the net work being done on the object is equal to zero. But when we are talking about a body moving upwards at constant velocity there is no change in its kinetic energy but there is still an increase in the g.p.e of the object. How is this possible. What I think is that the energy transferred by the positive work we are doing on the object is converted and stored as g.p.e by the negative work being done by gravity on the object. Please! someone correct me if I am wrong here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Muhammad asad said:
I have studied that if the kinetic energy of a moving body is not changing then the net work being done on the object is equal to zero.
That's right. The net work must include all work done on the body, including the work done by gravity.

Muhammad asad said:
But when we are talking about a body moving upwards at constant velocity there is no change in its kinetic energy but there is still an increase in the g.p.e of the object. How is this possible.
Note that the net work is still zero.

Muhammad asad said:
What I think is that the energy transferred by the positive work we are doing on the object is converted and stored as g.p.e by the negative work being done by gravity on the object.
Nothing wrong with that.
 
  • Like
Likes Muhammad asad
Thanks alot. Really appreciate your help
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K