Is length contraction an actual occurrence or merely an optical illusion?

In summary, length contraction is an actual occurrence that happens when different observers measure different lengths for the same object.
  • #1
smithnya
41
0
Hello everyone.

I was thinking about length contraction in Special Relativity last night. I looked up information on the internet, and from what I understand, length contrtaction has never been measured (I'm not completely sure if I simply failed to find information to the contrary). So my question is: Is length contraction an actual occurrence or merely an optical illusion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
smithnya said:
Hello everyone.

I was thinking about length contraction in Special Relativity last night. I looked up information on the internet, and from what I understand, length contrtaction has never been measured (I'm not completely sure if I simply failed to find information to the contrary). So my question is: Is length contraction an actual occurrence or merely an optical illusion?

smithnya, One way of thinking about the length contraction is to not consider that an object contracts at all. Rather, think of the universe as 4-dimensional occupied by 4-dimensional objects that extend billions of miles along a 4th dimension. Different observers (moving at relativistic speeds relative to each other) "live" in different 3-dimensional cross-sections of the 4-dimensional universe and therefore have different cross-section views of the same 4-dimensional object. The object itself, being 4-dimensional, does not do any contracting itself--it's just that different 3-D lengths would be measured by different observers just because of the different views of the same unchanging objective 4-D object.

Brian Greene's book (and video) depict the analagous slicing a loaf of bread at different angles yielding different widths of bread slices. So, it depends on the cross-section angle one uses for slicing the bread. The relative speeds of different observers determines the angle that the "bread" will be sliced (the angle of the 3-D cross-section of the 4-D object).
 
  • #4
bobc2 said:
smithnya, One way of thinking about the length contraction is to not consider that an object contracts at all. Rather, think of the universe as 4-dimensional occupied by 4-dimensional objects that extend billions of miles along a 4th dimension. Different observers (moving at relativistic speeds relative to each other) "live" in different 3-dimensional cross-sections of the 4-dimensional universe and therefore have different cross-section views of the same 4-dimensional object. The object itself, being 4-dimensional, does not do any contracting itself--it's just that different 3-D lengths would be measured by different observers just because of the different views of the same unchanging objective 4-D object.

Brian Greene's book (and video) depict the analagous slicing a loaf of bread at different angles yielding different widths of bread slices. So, it depends on the cross-section angle one uses for slicing the bread. The relative speeds of different observers determines the angle that the "bread" will be sliced (the angle of the 3-D cross-section of the 4-D object).

Ok, I think I understand better. Then essentially a measurement at different speeds would be analogous to a measurement of the cross-sectionof the loaf of bread at different angles? So let me ask something else: does the concept of length contraction then imply that it accours at any speed and not simply at relativistic speeds?
 
  • #5
Length contraction is just as much an actual occurrence as time dilation is. Neither are optical illusions. Nobody doubts the reality of time dilation because there is experimental evidence for it. However, a moving clock would not keep the same time if it traveled in different orientations if length contraction did not occur hand in hand with time dilation.

For example, a moving light clock where the beam is bouncing at right angles to the direction of motion experiences no length contraction but if it were rotated so that the beam is bouncing along the direction of motion, it needs length contraction in order to "tick" at the same rate.
 
  • #6
smithnya said:
Hello everyone.

I was thinking about length contraction in Special Relativity last night. I looked up information on the internet, and from what I understand, length contrtaction has never been measured (I'm not completely sure if I simply failed to find information to the contrary). So my question is: Is length contraction an actual occurrence or merely an optical illusion?

Combine Kennedy-Thorndike:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy–Thorndike_experiment

with the fact that time-dilation has been positively measured,
and you obtain a positive answer. :smile:

Cheers,
Harald

PS I now see that this was already mentioned by ghwellsjr; anyway I gave a reference for it. :-)
 
  • #7
smithnya said:
Ok, I think I understand better. Then essentially a measurement at different speeds would be analogous to a measurement of the cross-sectionof the loaf of bread at different angles?

Yes, you've got it.


smithnya said:
So let me ask something else: does the concept of length contraction then imply that it accours at any speed and not simply at relativistic speeds?

Yes. The contraction is so small with the every day speeds we normally observe that you cannot detect it witht he naked eye. Someone here will probably give you the algebraic equation for computing the contracted length for an object moving at any velocity, v. You can calculate how small or how large the contracted length is if you insert a small velocity or a very large velocity into the formula.
 
  • #8
harrylin said:
Combine Kennedy-Thorndike:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy–Thorndike_experiment

with the fact that time-dilation has been positively measured,
and you obtain a positive answer. :smile:

Cheers,
Harald

PS I now see that this was already mentioned by ghwellsjr; anyway I gave a reference for it. :-)

Thank you. I appreciate it much.
 
  • #9
bobc2 said:
Yes, you've got it.




Yes. The contraction is so small with the every day speeds we normally observe that you cannot detect it witht he naked eye. Someone here will probably give you the algebraic equation for computing the contracted length for an object moving at any velocity, v. You can calculate how small or how large the contracted length is if you insert a small velocity or a very large velocity into the formula.

Is there any theory as to the mechanism by which length contraction happens that you know of? Length contraction is an alteration of the geometry of matter, isn't it?
 
  • #10
  • #11
smithnya said:
Is there any theory as to the mechanism by which length contraction happens that you know of? Length contraction is an alteration of the geometry of matter, isn't it?

Remember, there is no contraction at all of the 4-dimensional object. Again, it's just that the different observers have different 3-D cross-section views of the same 4-D object.

A more fundamental question might be, "Why does each observer's X1 axis always rotate so that a photon world line would always bisect the angle between X1 and X4? This is a very mysterious aspect of special relativity. And along with this is the aspect that the 4-D world lines of all objects are organized (oriented) in a manner such that the laws of physics are the same in every one of the different sequences of 3-D cross-sections.

To emphasize: Each observer moves along his unique world line (along his X4 dimension), observing a continuous sequence of 3-D worlds (observers with motion relative to each other observe different 3-D worlds). Yet, the SAME laws of physics hold true for every observer's sequence of 3-D worlds. The unique aspect of the different Affine coordinate systems with the Lorentz transformation relationships (rotation of X1 such that photon world lines bisect the angle between X1 and X4) makes this magic work.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Here is a fanciful sketch of a 4-dimensional beam. We have a black coordinate system representing a "rest frame" along with a blue coordinate system representing the inertial frame associated with a blue guy moving relative to the rest frame. A beam is moving along with the blue guy. Note that the moving frame and the rest frame have different instantaneous 3-D cross-section views of the 4-dimensional beam. The green hypergeometric men have no problem understanding the situation--they can view all 4-dimensions at once--but we humans can only view one instantaneous 3-D cross-section at one instant of time.

4_D_Beam_Calibration-1.jpg
 
  • #13
bobc2 said:
Remember, there is no contraction at all of the 4-dimensional object. Again, it's just that the different observers have different 3-D cross-section views of the same 4-D object.

A more fundamental question might be, "Why does each observer's X1 axis always rotate so that a photon world line would always bisect the angle between X1 and X4? This is a very mysterious aspect of special relativity. And along with this is the aspect that the 4-D world lines of all objects are organized (oriented) in a manner such that the laws of physics are the same in every one of the different sequences of 3-D cross-sections.

To emphasize: Each observer moves along his unique world line (along his X4 dimension), observing a continuous sequence of 3-D worlds (observers with motion relative to each other observe different 3-D worlds). Yet, the SAME laws of physics hold true for every observer's sequence of 3-D worlds. The unique aspect of the different Affine coordinate systems with the Lorentz transformation relationships (rotation of X1 such that photon world lines bisect the angle between X1 and X4) makes this magic work.

Ugghh all of it makes my head spin :) I understand the basic concept, but I'm having difficulty rationalizing and picturing it in my head. Thanks for your explanation nevertheless. It cleared a lot up.
 
  • #14
bobc2 said:
Here is a fanciful sketch of a 4-dimensional beam. We have a black coordinate system representing a "rest frame" along with a blue coordinate system representing the inertial frame associated with a blue guy moving relative to the rest frame. A beam is moving along with the blue guy. Note that the moving frame and the rest frame have different instantaneous 3-D cross-section views of the 4-dimensional beam. The green hypergeometric men have no problem understanding the situation--they can view all 4-dimensions at once--but we humans can only view one instantaneous 3-D cross-section at one instant of time.

4_D_Beam_Calibration-1.jpg

Awesome. Thank you so much! This helps me vizualize it.
 

1. What is length contraction?

Length contraction, also known as Lorentz contraction, is a phenomenon in which the length of an object appears shorter when it is moving at high speeds relative to an observer. This is a consequence of Einstein's theory of relativity.

2. Is length contraction an actual occurrence?

Yes, length contraction is an actual occurrence that has been observed and measured in numerous experiments. It is a fundamental principle of relativity and is supported by a vast amount of evidence.

3. How does length contraction work?

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, as an object accelerates and approaches the speed of light, its length in the direction of motion appears to decrease from the perspective of an outside observer. This is due to the distortion of space and time caused by the object's high velocity.

4. Is length contraction the same as an optical illusion?

No, length contraction is not the same as an optical illusion. While it may appear to be an illusion to an observer, it is a real physical phenomenon that can be measured and predicted accurately using mathematical equations.

5. Are there any practical applications of length contraction?

Yes, length contraction has practical applications in fields such as particle physics and space travel. It is also taken into account in the design of high-speed trains and planes to minimize the effects of length contraction on the passengers.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
78
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
174
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
717
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
940
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
83
Views
3K
Back
Top