Is ln(-x) Defined for Negative Real Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kamataat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The natural logarithm function ln(-x) is defined for negative real numbers x, specifically when x < 0, as it translates to ln(-x) = ln(x) + iπ. This conclusion is supported by Euler's formula, which demonstrates the relationship between exponential and logarithmic functions in the complex plane. However, the extension of the natural logarithm to negative reals introduces complexities due to its multivalued nature, as ln(-x) can yield multiple valid results, such as ln(3) + iπ and ln(3) + 3iπ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural logarithms and their properties
  • Familiarity with Euler's formula and complex numbers
  • Knowledge of multivalued functions in complex analysis
  • Basic algebraic manipulation involving logarithmic identities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex logarithms and their applications
  • Explore Euler's formula in greater depth, particularly its implications in complex analysis
  • Learn about the principal branch of the logarithm and how to handle multivalued functions
  • Investigate the implications of logarithmic identities in advanced mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of logarithmic functions and their extensions into the complex plane.

Kamataat
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Is it true that that ln(-x) is defined for x \in R such that x &lt; 0?

- Kamataat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, yes... If x < 0 then -x > 0, and surely the natural logarithm is defined for all positive numbers.

I believe it can be extended to the negative reals as well, by using Euler's formula. For example, e^(ln(3) + ipi) = e^ln(3) * e^(ipi) = -3, so one might say that ln(-3) = ln(3) + ipi. I assume there are some technical difficulties in actually making such an extension rigorous, since (for example) ln(3) + 3ipi is also a possible "candidate" for being the natural logarithm of -3.
 
Complex logarithm is multivalued indeed.But that's another story.

Daniel.
 
I thought it was so (I mean, it's pretty obvious), but I had this weird doubt (sometimes that happens when I study maths), so had to ask. Thanks again, Muzza.

- Kamataat
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K