- 14,922
- 28
What evidence is this claim based on? What facts are being used? How are the facts being evaluated?ThomasT said:That's preferable to the damage to society that the continued criminalization of these things has caused.
What evidence is this claim based on? What facts are being used? How are the facts being evaluated?ThomasT said:That's preferable to the damage to society that the continued criminalization of these things has caused.
mgb_phys said:While in the USA illegal drugs are much cheaper and more easily available than prescriptions.
Ecstasy is a class A drug in the UK (highest possible classification - automatic jail term etc) total deaths cause = zero.but it does seem to me to be ridiculously demonized considering how harmful it really is.
The Dagda said:I don't really care all that much, but it does seem to me to be ridiculously demonized considering how harmful it really is.
XTC is considered a hard drugs in the Netherlands as well and is thus prohibited (although you can legally test pills at parties = control). Use can lead to over-heating/dehydration, depressions. It is risky to use in combination with alcohol and medication, as well as in combination with medical conditions such as heart disease, diabetes and epilepsy. Deaths are known to occur.mgb_phys said:Ecstasy is a class A drug in the UK (highest possible classification - automatic jail term etc) total deaths cause = zero.
I wonder if any deaths have been caused by the compound rather than existing conditions?Monique said:Deaths are known to occur.
Got some references? It can be claimed that some percentage of peanut-butter consumers as kids grow up to be long-term peanut-butter abusers. Peanut-butter sandwiches, Thai sauces, ants on a log... The devastation is extensive.Loren Booda said:Marijuana has recently been shown in an English study to significantly increase the incidence of psychoses in habitual users. I have seen elsewhere that 20% of users become habitual.
binzing said:Thats not going to happen...
As far as the coops, sure for pot, if its legalized but cocaine has no good use, so we don't really need to grow coca plants.
Proton Soup said:it's a decent anesthetic. it used to be sold over the counter as toothache drops.
the columbians for centuries also chewed the leaves to stave off hunger and as a mild stimulant while they labored.
i'm not sure i'd agree there are many useless drugs, just bad uses. even one OTC product has a form of methamphetamine in it.
At this point that is still a hypothesis. Smoking tobacco increases the incidence of lung cancer and it very addictive, but apparently that is socially accepted.Loren Booda said:Yesterday I heard that cannabis use increases the incidence of testicular cancer. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=cannabis+"testicular+cancer"&btnG=Search"
binzing said:Like the fact that as a Schedule I drug its right next to heroin, I find that absurd.
Monique said:At this point that is still a hypothesis. Smoking tobacco increases the incidence of lung cancer and it very addictive, but apparently that is socially accepted.
Loren Booda said:The marijuana which gave me addictive pleasure at first - for six years - provided me access to harder drugs, including LSD. After the acid I toked six more years, but achieved little pleasant sensation, instead smoking out of habit, only to feel all of the disturbing effects of marijuana. It was not until I quit pot that I finally reached a sense of normalcy. I could well be homeless if I hadn't. Now, 25 years later, the hardest drug I ingest is chocolate.
By the way, I received a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia 6 months after my LSD experience. I now have the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.
Marijuana has recently been shown in an English study to significantly increase the incidence of psychoses in habitual users. I have seen elsewhere that 20% of users become habitual.
Yesterday I heard that cannabis use increases the incidence of testicular cancer. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...22&btnG=Search
David Nutt of the University of Bristol wrote an opinion piece for the Journal of Psychopharmacology which compared society's perceptions of risk of taking ecstacy with other activities. The light-hearted piece compared "equasy" or Equine Addiction Syndrome with perceived risks of drugs.
The piece found equasy, or horse riding, caused acute harm to a person once in 350 episodes while ecstacy caused acute harm once in 10,000 episodes.
Nutt asked: "So why are harmful sporting activities allowed, whereas relatively less harmful drugs are not? I believe this reflects a societal approach which does not adequately balance the relative risks of drugs against their harms... The general public, especially the younger generation, are disillusioned with the lack of balanced political debate about drugs."
Good question. I don't know. But a quick survey of drug-related cases in Connecticut between 2002 and 2007 revealed a rather large (more than 10,000) number of drug-related arrests. About 1/3 were dismissed, about 1/3 were 'nolled'. A few thousand resulted in convictions and various penalties.Hurkyl said:What evidence is this claim based on? What facts are being used? How are the facts being evaluated?
mgb_phys said:Quick historical survey :
marijuana![]()
cocaine![]()
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a1/Queen_Victoria_-Golden_Jubilee_-3a_cropped.JPG/210px-Queen_Victoria_-Golden_Jubilee_-3a_cropped.JPG Opium
Alcohol![]()
EVERYTHING![]()
The honors go to...Keef!WhoWee said:2009-01-14-obamaofficialfull.jpg
reportedly "dabbled"
Makes me go back to the New Years Eve party on chat. SherryI might have a tiny glass of sherry, a glass of good wine, a finger of exquiste brandy, etc...
