Is Mass the Same as Weight in Truss Calculations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the weight of members in a truss structure as part of a mechanics of materials lab. Participants are exploring the relationship between mass and weight, particularly in the context of using imperial units.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations involved in determining the weight of truss members, including volume and density. Questions arise regarding the distinction between mass and weight, particularly when using pounds as a unit.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the use of units, noting that pounds are a unit of weight rather than mass. There is acknowledgment of the confusion that arises from the imperial system and its implications for engineering calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of ongoing confusion in the engineering profession regarding the use of imperial units, particularly in distinguishing between mass and weight. The original poster references a related discussion in the forum, indicating that this is a recurring topic.

dlacombe13
Messages
100
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Calculate the weight of each member of the truss structure.

Homework Equations


density = mass/volume

The Attempt at a Solution


This is part of a lab that we are doing in my mechanics of materials course. I have designed a structure, and I must calculate the weight of each member. In short, we have been given density, the cross-sectional area of each member, and the diagram of the structure (and thus length of each member). Volume is in in3 and density is in lb/in3 So what I have done so far is:
1) Calculate the volume of each member by multiplying the length by its cross-sectional area.
2) Calculate the mass of each member by multiplying the volume by density.

My question is, when the units cancel I am left with lbs. for the unit of mass. Is this the weight? Or do I need to multiply it by 32.2 ft/s2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lbs. is a unit of weight, not mass. When you multiply volume in in3 by density in lb/in3, you get weight in lbs. You do not multiply by 32.2 ft/s2.

On edit: If you really want mass, check this out
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_(mass)
 
dlacombe13 said:

Homework Statement


Calculate the weight of each member of the truss structure.

Homework Equations


density = mass/volume

The Attempt at a Solution


This is part of a lab that we are doing in my mechanics of materials course. I have designed a structure, and I must calculate the weight of each member. In short, we have been given density, the cross-sectional area of each member, and the diagram of the structure (and thus length of each member). Volume is in in3 and density is in lb/in3 So what I have done so far is:
1) Calculate the volume of each member by multiplying the length by its cross-sectional area.
2) Calculate the mass of each member by multiplying the volume by density.

My question is, when the units cancel I am left with lbs. for the unit of mass. Is this the weight? Or do I need to multiply it by 32.2 ft/s2?

This issue comes up a lot and has been dealt with quite thoroughly in this Forum; see
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/pounds-is-a-unit-of-mass-or-weight.259981/

As long as the engineering profession continues to stick with the imperial system this will be a continuing headache.
 
Okay thanks. It just strikes me as odd that the formula has mass, but yet you end up with weight. It's also crazy since this means the weight of the truss is only 10lbs and yet it holds up a 10,000lb load...But then again this is just a 2D model of what would really be a 3D structure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
794
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K