Is MinutePhysics (youtube) a reliable source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 42Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Source Youtube
Click For Summary
MinutePhysics is generally considered a reliable source for introductory physics concepts, as its creator, Henry Reich, holds a master's degree in physics and works with reputable institutions like the Perimeter Institute. However, the videos often involve significant oversimplification and analogies aimed at non-technical audiences, which can lead to misunderstandings if viewers take these analogies as absolute truths. While the explanations are engaging and provide a broad overview of complex topics, they may not fully capture the depth required for a comprehensive understanding of physics. Some critiques highlight inaccuracies in political commentary and claims about educational content in US physics classes, suggesting a need for viewers to supplement their learning with more rigorous resources. For deeper understanding, alternatives like Khan Academy, Academic Earth, and Coursera are recommended, along with channels that offer more detailed explanations, such as DrPhysicsA.
42Physics
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Is MinutePhysics (youtube) a reliable source? I've been watching his videos since they started, but some of the stuff he mentions I question, or is Physics so amazing that I can't believe it xD?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't watch the channel, but looking up Henry Reich let's you see that he's got a master's degree in physics, and is working for the Perimeter Institute, as well as collaborating with people like Neil Turok. Meaning, you can assume he probably knows his stuff.

If there's something specific from there that you feel is not right, make a thread about it and we'll try our best to explain.


And if you're looking for other video-type physics education, look up Khan Academy.
For college-level courses check Academic Earth or Coursera(off the top of my head).
 
I've brought a couple minutes physics videos to math/physics professors, inquiring about their authenticity, and the impression they've all given me is that there is often a good deal of oversimplification to deal with non-technical audiences, but the ideas and explanations are good.
 
Vorde said:
I've brought a couple minutes physics videos to math/physics professors, inquiring about their authenticity, and the impression they've all given me is that there is often a good deal of oversimplification to deal with non-technical audiences, but the ideas and explanations are good.
This is my impression.

The videos are oversimplification and analogies. The only bad part is people who take the analogies as absolute truth.
 
To me, they're enjoyable to watch. They give you a VERY broad overview/oversimplification of extremely complex physical concepts, so you definitely have to do more research outside his videos.
 
Also some of the more political videos are ripe with naivety and lack of knowledge like the video where he claims that photons and atomic structure are not taught in US physics class which is either semantics or lack of knowledge of the chemistry curriculum which has these topics. Followed by a list of topics which I can't possibly see fitting in a yearlong curriculum in physics. University lecturers have enough trouble teaching some of these topics as their own self contained class with more mathematically prepared students like with chaos theory.

You could get more tangible knowledge by viewing vids like
http://www.youtube.com/user/DrPhysicsA?feature=g-high-c
although they arent as flashy.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
705
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
508
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K