Is My Approach to Finding Absolute Magnitude Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shanepitts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Magnitude
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
shanepitts
Messages
84
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


1.2.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


m1-m2[/SB]=2.5log(ι21)

m-M=2.5log (d/10)2

3. The Attempt at a Solution
1.2 answer.png


Not sure if my approach and answers are correct

Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shanepitts said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 83971 [/B]

Homework Equations


m1-m2[/SB]=2.5log(ι21)

m-M=2.5log (d/10)2

3. The Attempt at a Solution
View attachment 83972

Not sure if my approach and answers are correct

Please help
First question: In your very first line with an equation, you changed the factor of 2.5 to a factor of 5 in front of the log. Why did you do this? This seems to be a mistake.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shanepitts
nrqed said:
First question: In your very first line with an equation, you changed the factor of 2.5 to a factor of 5 in front of the log. Why did you do this? This seems to be a mistake.

I forgot the exponential: m-M=2.5log(d/10)2
 
shanepitts said:
I forgot the exponential: m-M=2.5log(d/10)2
AH yes, Ok.

EDIT: you seem to have made a sign mistake. In the exponential for the calculation of the luminosity, you should have

M_1 - M_2 = M_1 - ( m +1.99) = 5 -m - 1.99


Then your work looks good. You just need to plug in the value of m=2. The absolute magnitude of the star is smaller than the Sun's absolute magnitude (3.99 versus 5) so the star has a larger luminosity than the Sun's and your final expression agrees with this. All the steps look good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shanepitts
nrqed said:
AH yes, Ok.

EDIT: you seem to have made a sign mistake. In the exponential for the calculation of the luminosity, you should have

M_1 - M_2 = M_1 - ( m +1.99) = 5 -m - 1.99Then your work looks good. You just need to plug in the value of m=2. The absolute magnitude of the star is smaller than the Sun's absolute magnitude (3.99 versus 5) so the star has a larger luminosity than the Sun's and your final expression agrees with this. All the steps look good.

Thanks a bunch and sorry for the typo
 
shanepitts said:
Thanks a bunch and sorry for the typo
You are welcome. And no problem about the typo, I make typos all the time :-)

Patrick
 
Last edited: