Is My Perturbative Solution of this Equation Correct?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter norman86
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the perturbative solution of the equation \(\frac{\beta^{2}}{4}-\frac{3}{8}\beta^{4}\alpha+\frac{2}{3}\beta^{6}\alpha^{2}=\frac{1}{4}\). The original poster incorrectly derived \(\beta=1+\frac{3}{4}\alpha-\frac{155}{96}\alpha^{2}\), while the correct solution is \(\beta=1+\frac{3}{4}\alpha+\frac{61}{96}\alpha^{2}\). The error was identified in the second-order calculations, specifically in the handling of the coefficients during the perturbative expansion. A more accurate method involves assuming a power series expansion and correctly calculating the coefficients \(k_1\) and \(k_2\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in mathematical physics
  • Familiarity with power series expansions
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Basic understanding of Taylor series and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study perturbation theory applications in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about power series and Taylor series expansions
  • Explore advanced algebra techniques for solving nonlinear equations
  • Investigate common mistakes in perturbative calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students engaged in theoretical physics or applied mathematics, particularly those working with perturbative methods and power series solutions.

norman86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all! I want to perturbatively solve this equation in \beta at second order in \alpha

\frac{\beta^{2}}{4}-\frac{3}{8}\beta^{4}\alpha+\frac{2}{3}\beta^{6}\alpha^{2}=\frac{1}{4}

I rewrite this formula in this way

\beta^{2}=1+\frac{3}{2}\beta^{4}\alpha-\frac{8}{3}\beta^{6}\alpha^{2}

When I try to solve it perturbatively, I obtain

\beta^{2}=1+\frac{3}{2}1^{2}\alpha-\frac{8}{3}\alpha^{2}\left(1+\frac{3}{2}1^{2}\alpha\right)^{3}

The result is

\beta^{2}=1+\frac{3}{2}\alpha-\frac{8}{3}\alpha^{2}

The square root of which gives

\beta=1+\frac{3}{4}\alpha-\frac{155}{96}\alpha^{2}

I know that the correct result is

\beta=1+\frac{3}{4}\alpha+\frac{61}{96}\alpha^{2}

Clearly, there is something wrong in the second order of my calculus.

Can anyone please tell me where I'm mistaking? Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm..
Not quite sure what you are doing here, I'm afraid.
Here's how I would do it.
Assume a power series expansion as the following:
\beta=1+k_{1}\alpha+k_{2}\alpha^{2}+++
We are to determine the k's in orders of alpha.
Inserting in your equation, and retaining terms of order 0 and 1, we get:
1+2k_{1}\alpha=1+\frac{3}{2}*1\to{k}_{1}=\frac{3}{4}

To order 2, we have:
k_{1}^{2}\alpha_{2}+2k_{2}\alpha^{2}=\frac{3}{2}*4k_{1}\alpha^{2}-\frac{8}{3}*1*\alpha^{2}
Or, we get the equation for k_2:
\frac{9}{16}+2k_{2}=\frac{9}{2}-\frac{8}{3}
Which yields:
2k_{2}=\frac{216-128-27}{48}=\frac{61}{48}
whereby the result follows.
 
You are right. That's the right way to do it. Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K