Is passion for classical physics enough to engineer?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A passion for classical physics does not automatically indicate a suitability for pursuing engineering. Engineering encompasses a broader scope, requiring knowledge of materials, CAD/CAM software, and adherence to regulations and standards. Different engineering disciplines, such as mechanical and electrical engineering, utilize varying principles of physics, with mechanical engineering focusing on materials and structures, while electrical engineering emphasizes electricity and electromagnetic waves. Therefore, individuals passionate about classical physics may find fulfillment in other fields that apply their knowledge without necessarily pursuing engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical physics principles
  • Familiarity with engineering disciplines (mechanical, electrical, structural)
  • Knowledge of CAD/CAM software tools
  • Awareness of engineering regulations and standards
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the differences between mechanical and electrical engineering
  • Research CAD/CAM software tools like AutoCAD and SolidWorks
  • Learn about engineering regulations and standards relevant to various fields
  • Investigate alternative careers that utilize classical physics knowledge, such as research or education
USEFUL FOR

Students considering engineering careers, educators in physics, professionals in engineering fields, and individuals exploring alternative applications of classical physics knowledge.

annoyinggirl
Messages
217
Reaction score
10
Let's say one has a passion for classical physics - he/she wants to learn all there is to learn about classical physics. Given that she/he has the intelligence and work ethic, does a passion for classical physics an indication enough that she/he should pursue engineering? Or could one love classical physics but dislike engineering? If so, why is that , since engineering is just the application of classical physics? What else could someone passionate about classical physics do besides engineering (that utilizes knowledge about classical physics).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
annoyinggirl said:
If so, why is that , since engineering is just the application of classical physics?

Engineering is not merely an application of classical physics. Things built in the real world must be constructed from available materials and parts. For example, mechanical engineer needs to know the available types of steel, sizes of bolts, types of gears etc. An engineer needs to know CAD/CAM software tools and how to write specifications.
 
annoyinggirl said:
Let's say one has a passion for classical physics - he/she wants to learn all there is to learn about classical physics. Given that she/he has the intelligence and work ethic, does a passion for classical physics an indication enough that she/he should pursue engineering? Or could one love classical physics but dislike engineering? If so, why is that , since engineering is just the application of classical physics? What else could someone passionate about classical physics do besides engineering (that utilizes knowledge about classical physics).

Not all types of engineering use physical principles equally. For example, an electrical engineer would deal more with electricity and electromagnetic waves, and less with water waves, or structures, for example. A structural engineer, of course, would deal quite a lot with structures, but not so much with atomic physics, or electricity, etc.

Unlike physics, a lot of engineering practice is codified in various regulations, standards, and other rules with which an engineer must be familiar.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K