Is passion for classical physics enough to engineer?

In summary: For example, an engineer who works on a bridge must be familiar with the rules and regulations governing the construction of bridges. In summary, a passionate interest in classical physics is not always a good indication that someone should pursue engineering. However, if an individual has a good background in physics and also has engineering experience, they would be well prepared to pursue a career in engineering.
  • #1
annoyinggirl
218
10
Let's say one has a passion for classical physics - he/she wants to learn all there is to learn about classical physics. Given that she/he has the intelligence and work ethic, does a passion for classical physics an indication enough that she/he should pursue engineering? Or could one love classical physics but dislike engineering? If so, why is that , since engineering is just the application of classical physics? What else could someone passionate about classical physics do besides engineering (that utilizes knowledge about classical physics).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
annoyinggirl said:
If so, why is that , since engineering is just the application of classical physics?

Engineering is not merely an application of classical physics. Things built in the real world must be constructed from available materials and parts. For example, mechanical engineer needs to know the available types of steel, sizes of bolts, types of gears etc. An engineer needs to know CAD/CAM software tools and how to write specifications.
 
  • #3
annoyinggirl said:
Let's say one has a passion for classical physics - he/she wants to learn all there is to learn about classical physics. Given that she/he has the intelligence and work ethic, does a passion for classical physics an indication enough that she/he should pursue engineering? Or could one love classical physics but dislike engineering? If so, why is that , since engineering is just the application of classical physics? What else could someone passionate about classical physics do besides engineering (that utilizes knowledge about classical physics).

Not all types of engineering use physical principles equally. For example, an electrical engineer would deal more with electricity and electromagnetic waves, and less with water waves, or structures, for example. A structural engineer, of course, would deal quite a lot with structures, but not so much with atomic physics, or electricity, etc.

Unlike physics, a lot of engineering practice is codified in various regulations, standards, and other rules with which an engineer must be familiar.
 

1. Is a passion for classical physics necessary to be an engineer?

No, a passion for classical physics is not necessary to be an engineer. While a strong understanding of classical physics can certainly be beneficial in engineering, it is not the only subject that is important. Other subjects such as mathematics, computer science, and materials science are also essential in engineering.

2. Can someone without a passion for classical physics still become a successful engineer?

Yes, someone without a passion for classical physics can still become a successful engineer. While a passion for the subject can certainly be helpful, it is not the only factor that determines success in engineering. Hard work, dedication, and a strong understanding of other important subjects can also lead to success in this field.

3. Is a background in classical physics necessary to pursue a career in engineering?

No, a background in classical physics is not necessary to pursue a career in engineering. Many engineering programs offer introductory courses in physics to provide students with the necessary foundations for their engineering courses. As long as a student is willing to put in the effort to learn and understand the concepts, they can still excel in engineering without a previous background in classical physics.

4. Can a passion for classical physics help someone excel in a specific type of engineering?

Yes, a passion for classical physics can certainly help someone excel in a specific type of engineering. For example, a strong understanding of classical mechanics can be beneficial for someone pursuing a career in mechanical engineering. However, it is important to note that a passion for other subjects and a well-rounded education are also important in becoming a successful engineer.

5. Are there any engineering fields that do not require a strong understanding of classical physics?

While a strong understanding of classical physics is important in many engineering fields, there are some fields that may not require as much knowledge in this subject. For example, software engineering may not require as much understanding of classical physics compared to other fields such as mechanical or civil engineering. However, a basic understanding of physics and other subjects is still necessary for success in any engineering field.

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
47
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
420
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top