Is Passive Reading Effective in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zahero_2007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Reading
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of passive reading as a study method in physics and mathematics. Participants share their experiences and opinions on whether this approach aids in understanding complex subjects or if it leads to confusion and retention issues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant finds passive reading helpful for covering material quickly before engaging in active reading with notes.
  • Another participant argues that passive reading does not work for them in math or physics, as they struggle to understand the material when reading quickly.
  • A different participant mentions that they derive formulas first and then read passively to gain a conceptual understanding.
  • One post suggests that reading with a specific question or problem in mind can enhance understanding, contrasting "searching mode" with "chasing mode."
  • Another participant notes that they often feel sleepy during passive reading, questioning the effectiveness of this method.
  • A later reply humorously exaggerates the sleepiness experienced during passive reading, sharing a negative experience from a particle physics class.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of passive reading, with no consensus reached. Some find it beneficial, while others argue it hinders their understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants' experiences vary based on individual learning styles, and the discussion highlights the subjective nature of study methods in complex subjects.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and educators in physics and mathematics, as well as individuals interested in study techniques and learning strategies.

zahero_2007
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
What do you think about this reading style ? Iam used to passively read a textbook in physics or math to get a picture about what this is all about then I Actively read the text carefully with a pen and papers . Passive reading makes me cover a lot of material in a relatively short time for example in differential geometry . What do you think of this method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it works for you, it's ok :cool:

I used to do that studying other disciplines other than math/physics. I can't do it in maths or physics because I can't understand anything if I read things fast, and I usually think it's harder than it really is. I always see very rapidly what's on the book just for curiousity, but it doesn't help me...
 
I first go through the deriving of all the formulas and then go back to read passively to understand in English.
 
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/05/chase-your-reading.html
It seems to me that while reading non-fiction, most folks are in searching mode. Most would be more intellectually productive, however, in chasing mode. It helps to have in mind a question, puzzle, or problem, and then read in order to answer your question, explain your puzzle, or solve your problem.

One particularly helpful comment for me is that

Searching allows you to create the boxes that chasing can fill in the first place.

I, too, really need to get a big picture before delving in any specific topic, otherwise I'll forget the details easily. However, I'm going to fall asleep if I read books passively. So I have to keep in mind when reading passively that my goal is to find an interesting problem, a piece of the big picture, and get started deriving and calculating things.
 
Truecrimson said:
However, I'm going to fall asleep if I read books passively.
Why is that bad? When I study I usually read for 30 minutes, then sleep/rest for 5-30 minutes depending on how exhausting the read was, repeat. Resting/sleeping while studying helps your mind process and retain the information.
 
I actually exaggerated that part. But there was one time when I took a particle physics class using Martin and Shaw. It's that bad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K