Is Photon Mass Zero a Scientific Reality or a Misconception?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of photon mass, specifically whether photons have zero mass or if they possess some form of mass. Participants explore the implications of photon behavior, particularly in relation to force and momentum, and the classical mechanics equation F=ma. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, personal insights, and references to existing literature.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that photons have zero rest mass but possess energy and momentum, allowing them to exert force.
  • Others argue that a measurable force implies a mass must be associated with it, challenging the notion of zero mass for photons.
  • A participant introduces a nuanced view on the application of F=ma, suggesting that it is not strictly true at relativistic speeds and discusses the implications of mass and momentum in this context.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the constancy of the speed of light, referencing historical debates and claims that the speed of light may have varied in the early universe.
  • Another participant mentions radiation pressure as a phenomenon related to the force exerted by electromagnetic waves, linking it to the discussion on photon mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether photons have mass or the implications of their behavior. Multiple competing views remain, with some asserting zero mass and others challenging that notion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to classical mechanics and relativistic physics, highlighting the complexity of defining mass in different contexts. There are also mentions of historical scientific debates and evolving theories regarding the speed of light.

Bart001
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Photon Mass Zero?

Ok right to the point, I've learned that a Photon since it is moving at c has a mass zero, but yet I've also heard that with a sensitive enough scale, that you can measure the force of sunlight or other light as photons...very small force, but still a force
A measureable force, must have a mass associated with it.
F=ma - classical or not, still true...

and if there's a mass with a velocity c, then...
 
Science news on Phys.org
Photons have zero rest mass. However, they do have energy and momentum, so they can exert force. Only zero rest mass things can travel at the speed of light.
 
mathman said:
Photons have zero rest mass. However, they do have energy and momentum, so they can exert force. Only zero rest mass things can travel at the speed of light.
To add to this, consider Newton's second law, "'An applied force is equal to the rate of change of momentum'."
 
Bart001 said:
A measureable force, must have a mass associated with it. NO!
F=ma - classical or not, still NOT true...

there's NEVER a mass with a velocity c.
I need at least ten letters for the answer.
 
Bart001 said:
Ok right to the point, I've learned that a Photon since it is moving at c has a mass zero, but yet I've also heard that with a sensitive enough scale, that you can measure the force of sunlight or other light as photons...very small force, but still a force
A measureable force, must have a mass associated with it.
F=ma - classical or not, still true...
and if there's a mass with a velocity c, then...

actually Bart, [itex]F = m a = m \frac{dv}{dt}[/itex] is not precisely true, but is very close at slow speeds relative to the speed of light when the mass of the object remains constant. the accurate expression is:

[tex]F = \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{d(mv)}{dt} = m \frac{dv}{dt} + v \frac{dm}{dt}[/tex]

due to the product rule of differentiation. so if you had a body moving at a constant velocity, v, and somehow its mass was increasing (thus increasing its momentum) a force would be required to keep it going at that constant velocity.

that being said, i am of "the other side" which maintains that Photons have mass, but no rest mass. . differentiating between "mass" in general and "rest mass" seems to be out of vogue of late but the reality of that difference exists. the reason there can be no rest mass is that if any particle moving at c did have rest mass, its relativistic mass would be infinite at speed c, and photons do not have infinite mass.
 
sorry for my ignorace... I'm still second year physics, and just really trying to have a FEEL and Intuition for Physics...lol...
Also a lot is based on the fact that c is a constant... but some physicist contend this... that c may not be constant, and Einstein might be wrong
I'm really not trying to piss you guys off or seem like a know it all , that might not know anything...lol...
I also read that Hawking retracted a couple theories or papers, in light of new evidence and reconsideration... and I'm sure they were accepted as LAW...

In my last year of high school, I had to do a research paper for english and being a physics student I picked, Trying to say the speed of light was not a constant...
Two papers were my foundation, one from "I think" cambridge and MIT...
1. made light travel through a cesium gas tube faster than c, almost 300 times faster, and,
2. made light travel at 26mph in a gas tube...
Also, another paper said that maybe at the time of the big bang the speed of light was 300 times faster...

So I went on to say that the speed of light depends on the energy in the medium that it travels... Big bang, Very energetic and very fast
And now the universe has cooled and the speed has slowed down to the current speed of c...
And Another textbook actually had a graph that the speed of light has change since the bigbang, and for the couple hundred years that we have been able to measure it, the universe hasnt cooled measureably...

SOrry for this being SOOO long...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K