Is Rhodium Likely to Have Positive Ion States with Noble-Gas Configuration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter needhelpperson
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether rhodium (Rh) can achieve positive ion states with a noble-gas configuration, specifically that of Argon. Participants concluded that achieving such a configuration would require removing electrons from the 4d and 5s shells, which would demand significant ionization energy, making it highly unlikely. The role of lattice energy in ionic compounds was also highlighted as a relevant factor in this context. Resources such as WebElements were suggested for further numerical insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ionization energy and its implications on electron removal
  • Familiarity with noble-gas configurations in relation to transition metals
  • Knowledge of lattice energy and its significance in ionic compounds
  • Basic chemistry concepts regarding electron shells and subshells
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ionization energies of rhodium and compare them with other transition metals
  • Explore the concept of lattice energy and its calculations for ionic compounds
  • Study noble-gas configurations and their stability in transition metals
  • Investigate the implications of electron shell configurations on chemical reactivity
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals interested in transition metal chemistry and the behavior of elements in ionic states.

needhelpperson
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Help please, due tomorrow!

Do you expect the element rhodium, symbol Rh, to have positive ion states in which the metal ion has a noble-gas configuration? Use ionization energies and lattice energy to explain your answer.

I don't know where this question is trying to get at. Is it trying to ask if it is either more likely to be negative or positive?

the electrons that are needed to be removed are in the shells 4d and 5s in order for it to have a noble-gas configuration of Argon. There are 8 in the 4d and 1 in the 5s.

I'll give you my input. I said that NO i do not expect that because the ionization energy would be too immense before it reaches the configuration state of Argon so it would be highly unlikely. How do i use lattice energy to explain this?

And if i was wrong for the ionization energy can some one correct me, please? Thanks a lot.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
33K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K