Is Russell Crowe Too Old to Play Young Robin Hood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around opinions on Russell Crowe's casting as Robin Hood, with mixed feelings about his suitability for the role. Some participants express admiration for Crowe's acting skills, particularly in films like Gladiator, while others criticize his appearance and age in relation to the character. Comparisons are made to previous portrayals of Robin Hood, notably criticizing Kevin Costner's performance. The conversation also touches on the historical accuracy of the Robin Hood story and the evolution of the character over time. Ultimately, there is a consensus that the film's approach may differ from traditional portrayals, aiming for a more realistic depiction.

Russell Crowe is

  • Too old

    Votes: 6 21.4%
  • Too ugly

    Votes: 3 10.7%
  • Too old and ugly

    Votes: 7 25.0%
  • At least he's not Kevin Costner

    Votes: 20 71.4%

  • Total voters
    28
  • #101
I hadn't seen anything much about the new movie, and guess my view is swayed by an amalgamation of Scott’s Locksley and Ivanhoe, as their stories have mingled a bit over time and Ivanhoe is often described as the ‘young knight’. This also places the setting earlier than the movie.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
The actual character lived in the first century AD and killed everyone who ventured near his territory.

Richard the Lion Hearted also never spoke a word of English (Richard, Coeur de Lion) as he was a Norman king.
 
  • #103
I heard from a friend yesterday that the movie got poor reviews.

Adrian Paul is a hottie and so is Sir Sean Connery! :smile: Paul Smailes is one of the most interesting men.

Ah well, I've contributed more than this post to the topic. Nuff said, except I'd like to see Robin Hood played on stage with all the actors wearing masks. Of course, I'd design them! LOL!
 
  • #104
ViewsofMars said:
I heard from a friend yesterday that the movie got poor reviews.
The reviews aren't very good.

Russell Crowe's 'Robin Hood' robs from the filmgoers

The latest Robin Hood might as well be called John Doe in Chain Mail for all the resemblance it bears to the legendary character.

That might not be so bad if the alternative portrait was intriguing. But Robin Hood, as envisioned by Ridley Scott and scripted by Brian Helgeland, is an unnecessary and wrong-headed reboot.

Robin of the 'Hood spends a lot of time somberly shooting arrows, a modicum of time proving his heroic decency, especially around royals, and a little time in the company of Lady Marion (no blushing maiden here). But what's missing is a sense of fun.

http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2010-05-13-robinhood13_ST_N.htm
 
  • #105
Evo said:
The reviews aren't very good.
...

Whew! the reviews are terrible. I had great hopes for the film. Doesn't sound like any of my expectations panned out. :redface:
 
  • #106
I hadn't realized the name of the director of the new film is "Scott", too. Just to be clear, I was talking of Sir Walter's description, not Ridley's.
 
  • #107
What's even more ridiculous is that the movie is supposed to be about the *YOUNG* Robin Hood, before he became the well known bandit in Sherwood Forest! :smile:
 
  • #108
Evo said:
What's even more ridiculous is that the movie is supposed to be about the *YOUNG* Robin Hood, before he became the well known bandit in Sherwood Forest! :smile:
That's in case it's successful, you have a franchise.
Start with Young Robin Hood, then Robin Hood the high school movie, then Robin Hood goes to college ...

This way you don't have to do prequels.
 
Back
Top