Is Russell Crowe Too Old to Play Young Robin Hood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the casting of Russell Crowe as Robin Hood, focusing on age appropriateness, actor suitability, and varying interpretations of the character. Participants express their opinions on Crowe's acting abilities, past portrayals of Robin Hood, and the direction of the upcoming film.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express strong dislike for Russell Crowe, questioning his suitability for the role due to his age.
  • Others defend Crowe, citing his acting skills and suggesting that the film may take a more realistic approach to the Robin Hood legend.
  • There are critiques of previous portrayals of Robin Hood, particularly Kevin Costner's performance, with some participants emphasizing the inconsistency in his accent.
  • Some participants argue that Robin Hood could realistically be portrayed as a middle-aged man, referencing historical contexts where older individuals were leaders.
  • Discussions arise about the evolution of the Robin Hood story, with some noting that traditional narratives do not include him going on Crusades.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the film's direction and whether it will align with their expectations of the character.
  • There are differing opinions on what constitutes an ideal portrayal of Robin Hood, with some suggesting that he should be depicted as attractive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on Crowe's suitability for the role or the direction of the film. Multiple competing views remain regarding the character's portrayal and the expectations of the audience.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various adaptations of Robin Hood, indicating that interpretations of the character have changed over time. There is mention of historical inaccuracies and modern updates in the upcoming film, which may influence audience perceptions.

Who May Find This Useful

Fans of film adaptations of classic literature, those interested in character portrayals in cinema, and individuals discussing actor suitability for iconic roles may find this discussion relevant.

Russell Crowe is

  • Too old

    Votes: 6 21.4%
  • Too ugly

    Votes: 3 10.7%
  • Too old and ugly

    Votes: 7 25.0%
  • At least he's not Kevin Costner

    Votes: 20 71.4%

  • Total voters
    28
  • #91
Well, at least the Swamp Loggers episode following was believable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
mheslep said:
I believe Sci Fi author Phillip Dick gets the credit for that story line.

That particular plot point was not in the book. If you have not read it the book is actually quite different from the movie.
 
  • #93
Evo said:
This thread is about Crowe being too old and too ugly to play Robin Hood. The earliest written reference said Robin Hood was 20 and two years.

they aged quickly back in those days---40 was the old 22 back then---and no one was attractive back in those days----he's perfect for the role
 
  • #94
rewebster said:
they aged quickly back in those days---40 was the old 22 back then---and no one was attractive back in those days----he's perfect for the role
The best Robin hood movie is the one with Sean Connery, Crowe is younger than that AND can do an english accent.
 
  • #95
I watched Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves several times simply to watch Alan Rickman. His performance redeemed the whole entire movie. Whole. Entire.

The movie posters and trailers with Russell Crowe certainly suggest a war movie, as Zooby pointed out. I'm not a fan of gore and violence.
 
  • #96
'Robin Hood' Revisited: Not Entirely On Target
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126761271
by Kenneth Turan
. . . this take on the tale misses the joy of the earlier films staring Errol Flynn and Douglas Fairbanks that captivated previous generations.
I think Errol and Douglas set the standard for dashing and debonaire, which unfortunately Crowe isn't - necessarily. Maybe he will surprise. But then again, debonaire is in the eye of the beholder.
 
  • #97
Adrian Paul (The Highlander) should have been cast as Robin Hood. He's 50 but he looks a lot younger and fitter than Crowe. The pic is from a movie last year. And he's British.

[PLAIN]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/8042/adrianpaulrecent.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #98
How Robin Hoods men really treated the poor



A little comedic relief

Monty Python - Dennis Moore
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #99
More Lupins!
 
  • #100
Robin Hood robbed from everybody and kept everything.

He had a good press agent.

Mel Brooks, the 2000 year old man
 
  • #101
I hadn't seen anything much about the new movie, and guess my view is swayed by an amalgamation of Scott’s Locksley and Ivanhoe, as their stories have mingled a bit over time and Ivanhoe is often described as the ‘young knight’. This also places the setting earlier than the movie.
 
  • #102
The actual character lived in the first century AD and killed everyone who ventured near his territory.

Richard the Lion Hearted also never spoke a word of English (Richard, Coeur de Lion) as he was a Norman king.
 
  • #103
I heard from a friend yesterday that the movie got poor reviews.

Adrian Paul is a hottie and so is Sir Sean Connery! :smile: Paul Smailes is one of the most interesting men.

Ah well, I've contributed more than this post to the topic. Nuff said, except I'd like to see Robin Hood played on stage with all the actors wearing masks. Of course, I'd design them! LOL!
 
  • #104
ViewsofMars said:
I heard from a friend yesterday that the movie got poor reviews.
The reviews aren't very good.

Russell Crowe's 'Robin Hood' robs from the filmgoers

The latest Robin Hood might as well be called John Doe in Chain Mail for all the resemblance it bears to the legendary character.

That might not be so bad if the alternative portrait was intriguing. But Robin Hood, as envisioned by Ridley Scott and scripted by Brian Helgeland, is an unnecessary and wrong-headed reboot.

Robin of the 'Hood spends a lot of time somberly shooting arrows, a modicum of time proving his heroic decency, especially around royals, and a little time in the company of Lady Marion (no blushing maiden here). But what's missing is a sense of fun.

http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2010-05-13-robinhood13_ST_N.htm
 
  • #105
Evo said:
The reviews aren't very good.
...

Whew! the reviews are terrible. I had great hopes for the film. Doesn't sound like any of my expectations panned out. :redface:
 
  • #106
I hadn't realized the name of the director of the new film is "Scott", too. Just to be clear, I was talking of Sir Walter's description, not Ridley's.
 
  • #107
What's even more ridiculous is that the movie is supposed to be about the *YOUNG* Robin Hood, before he became the well known bandit in Sherwood Forest! :smile:
 
  • #108
Evo said:
What's even more ridiculous is that the movie is supposed to be about the *YOUNG* Robin Hood, before he became the well known bandit in Sherwood Forest! :smile:
That's in case it's successful, you have a franchise.
Start with Young Robin Hood, then Robin Hood the high school movie, then Robin Hood goes to college ...

This way you don't have to do prequels.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
91
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
29K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
5K