Is Separating Negative Numbers in Math Valid?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Delzac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study

Interesting?

  • Ha ha very amusing!

    Votes: 8 57.1%
  • Hell no so boring!

    Votes: 6 42.9%

  • Total voters
    14
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
13 replies · 6K views
Delzac
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Just some interesting stuff to share.

Study = Don't Fail--------(1)
Don't Study = Fail--------(2)

Add (1) &(2)

Study + Don't Study = Don't Fail + Fail

Factorising the equation,

Study(1+Don't) = Fail(1+Don't)

Study = Fail !?!

:P

Delzac
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Dividing (1) by (2)
study/(don't study) = (don't fail)/fail
Hence 1/(don't) = don't
Or don't =1 or -1

If don't = -1
1+don't = 0
Division by 0 is illegal.

If don't =1 (the multiplicative identity), then (1) and (2), both become: study=fail,
which is not inconsistent with the final result.
 
Last edited:
lol didn't notice thanks for the note:blushing:
 
hmm...if Don't = 1 then it takes the fun out of things already, but is can't be -1 also...zzzzz i will try think of a better equation. ^^
 
Try this one (which is a rather old "puzzle")

1 = sqrt(1) = sqrt(-1*-1) = sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1)=i*i=-1

so 1 = -1 !

[Now before people jump all over me on that, I KNOW where the fault is].

Zz.
 
I've got a good one:

Women = Money * Time

Time = Money (Time is money!)

Women = (Money)^2

Money = sqrt(Evil) (Money is the ROOT of all evil...)

So, Women = Evil :devil:

Of course I've known this all along, I just have a mathematical proof of it now :smile:
 
Nice one mech, how very true.

Anyway referring back to zapper, something must be wrong, but i just can't a hand to it. take this for example.

1 = sqrt(1) = sqrt( -1*-1) = sqrt( (-1)^2 ) = (-1)^(2/2) = -1 ??

For now i can't solve, i will get back to you later.
 
The answer is simple, and exemplified by shortening the process some:

-a = sqrt(a^2) = a
 
hmm...here's my initial thought.

X = sqrt ( (+-x)^2 ) there is something wrong with this step right?
 
Yes, it's like saying: 0 = inv. sin (0) = pi

The square root (like the inverse sine) is not strictly a function, because it is a one-to-many mapping (functions, strictly, are may-to-one, or one-to-oe maps). These are sometimes, loosely called multiple valued functions, with the condition that a principal value is assigned to the image (like the positive square root) when it's not specified which image you are talking about.
 
Gokul43201 said:
Dividing (1) by (2)
study/(don't study) = (don't fail)/fail
Hence 1/(don't) = don't
Or don't =1 or -1

If don't = -1
1+don't = 0
Division by 0 is illegal.

If don't =1 (the multiplicative identity), then (1) and (2), both become: study=fail,
which is not inconsistent with the final result.


Hahaha! That has to be one of the best replies to a joke I have ever heard.:smile:
 
can i also solve the problem by saying that: 1 = sqrt ( (-1)^2) = l -1 l = 1

is this explanation valid?
 
I think some of you are spending too much time on turning words and phrases into mathematical shenanigans.
 
Anyway, When i ask my Math teacher about

" 1 = sqrt(1) = sqrt(-1*-1) = sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1)=i*i=-1 ".
-------------------^^^^^------------------------
She says that it is not valid because if u have negative numbers in brackets, then u cannot separate them out, instead u must work them out 1st bacause negative numbers are special. which i feel is crap. But is her explanation correct?