Is Sin^-1 X = (Sin X ) ^ -1 ?from my book it stated :f(x) =

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Voilstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that Sin^-1 X is not equal to (Sin X)^-1, emphasizing that Sin^-1 X represents the arcsine function, while (Sin X)^-1 denotes the multiplicative inverse of sin X. The derivative of the arcsine function is correctly stated as f'(x) = 1/(1-X^2)^(1/2), contrasting with the incorrect derivative f'(x) = -cot X / sin X. The notation Sin^-1 is deemed misleading, particularly for beginners, and the preference for using arcsin is strongly advocated to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse trigonometric functions
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts, particularly derivatives
  • Knowledge of function notation and its implications
  • Basic understanding of mathematical notation conventions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of inverse trigonometric functions
  • Learn how to derive the derivatives of arcsin, arccos, and arctan
  • Explore the differences between function inverses and multiplicative inverses
  • Review calculus textbooks for proper notation of inverse functions
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus, educators teaching trigonometric functions, and anyone seeking clarity on the distinction between arcsin and Sin^-1 notation.

Voilstone
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Is Sin^-1 X = (Sin X ) ^ -1 ??from my book ... it stated :f(x) =

Is Sin^-1 X = (Sin X ) ^ -1 ??

from my book ... it stated :
f(x) = Sin ^-1 X
f'(x) = 1/(1-X^2)^1/2

instead of f'(x) = -cot X / sin X

Why is it so ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


First of all, sin^1(x) =/= 1/(sinx). It's a convention to write it as sin^1(x), but it means arcsin of x, the inverse function of sinx.

Do you know how to take the derivative of inverse trigonometric functions? This is typically covered in any freshman calculus book. Try to see if you can't come up with the answer on your own first, we don't want to rob you of the spirit of discovery. ::smile:
 


thanks ! want to make sure between the relationship with sin X and Sin ^-1 X ... =D
 


It's higly misleading esecially to starters not to use <arcsin> for the inverse of sine. But this unfortunate notation with the -1 in the exponent is propagated also because of software such as maple and mathematica and essentially should stay there and not invade calculus textbooks...
 


dextercioby said:
It's higly misleading esecially to starters not to use <arcsin> for the inverse of sine. But this unfortunate notation with the -1 in the exponent is propagated also because of software such as maple and mathematica and essentially should stay there and not invade calculus textbooks...
I agree that inverse trig functions should first be presented as arcsin, arccos, arctan, etc., rather that sin-1, cos-1, tan-1. However, how can we represent the inverse of an arbitrary function f other than with the standard notation f-1?

The problem is that students confuse expressions such as x-1, the multiplicative inverse of x (or 1/x), with f-1, the function inverse of f, which has nothing to do with multiplication or division.

Exponent notation for function inverses is a convenient and compact form that, like all notations, takes some time to learn.
 


agree with that ... when i tell some of my frens that Sin^-1 X =/= 1/Sin X , they feel shock too ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
931
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K