Is Space Discrete or Continuous in a Planck World?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of space at the Planck scale, specifically whether space is discrete or continuous. Participants explore theoretical implications of movement and interaction at this scale, considering both hypothetical scenarios and existing theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether movement can occur in increments of Planck lengths and discusses the implications of a hypothetical world where all movement occurs by contact alone.
  • Another participant notes the speculative nature of the idea that reality might be discrete in position and time, suggesting that if true, movement would only occur in discrete amounts defined by Planck units.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that movement depends on the coordinate axis chosen, asserting that while one can move a Planck distance, one cannot travel half a Planck length.
  • Further elaboration is provided on the scenario of two accelerating planes separated by a Planck length, questioning whether they could collide under different conditions of movement.
  • One participant suggests that in a discrete system, a distance of one Planck length would imply that two objects are colliding, raising questions about the nature of proximity in such a universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of space at the Planck scale, with no consensus reached on whether space is discrete or continuous. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the speculative nature of their claims and the limitations of current understanding regarding movement and interaction at the Planck scale. The discussion highlights the dependence on definitions and assumptions about physical reality at this scale.

dst
Messages
379
Reaction score
0
On a ruler, you could move from the 1cm marking on a ruler to the 2cm marking, or you could move from the 0.5cm marking to the 1.5cm marking - both are 1cm movements but you cannot go from 1.5cm to 1cm in a 1cm movement. If we had Planck co-ordinates, could you move from 1 => 2 and also 1.5 => 2.5, and from 1 => 1.5?

Also, in a hypothetical world where all movement occurs by contact alone, suppose we have two perfectly smooth flat planes, and no "action at a distance" in any way, separated exactly by 1 Planck length. Could these plates collide?

In other words - is space continuous but appears discrete when probed, or is it absolutely discrete?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
the Planck scale is pretty ridiculously tiny (10-25 the size of atoms). i don't think any human being knows exactly what movement could be happening down at that scale. i don't think it is widely accepted physics, but i think some physicists (maybe they were physicist wannabees, i can't remember who it was) have hypothesized that reality might be discrete in position and time (kinda like cellular automata) and that the Planck Length is the unit of discrete length and the Planck Time is the unit of discrete time. but nobody knows if that is true. if it happens to be true, then movement could only be in discrete amounts (equal to either one Planck Length in any direction or zero movement) and would happen at discrete times (separated by the Planck Time). there would be no halfway between adjacent Planck length positions. i dunno. it's "highly speculative".
 
it all depends on your coordinate axis. I think the answer to your question is yes. You can move one cm to right, or you can move one Planck distance to the right. Don't think of it in terms of 0.5 -> 1.5 or something. The physical part is only the difference (1), not the actual coordinate representation, because that depends where you set your origin.
However, you can't travel half a Planck length as far as i know. Planck length is the lowest meaningful distance. But I'm not an expert on this so take that with a grain of salt.

when i heard of spacetime being quantized this way, one idea crept into mind immediately: Matrix :)
 
Mephisto said:
it all depends on your coordinate axis. I think the answer to your question is yes. You can move one cm to right, or you can move one Planck distance to the right. Don't think of it in terms of 0.5 -> 1.5 or something. The physical part is only the difference (1), not the actual coordinate representation, because that depends where you set your origin.
However, you can't travel half a Planck length as far as i know. Planck length is the lowest meaningful distance. But I'm not an expert on this so take that with a grain of salt.

when i heard of spacetime being quantized this way, one idea crept into mind immediately: Matrix :)

Well, here's a better example. Two infinitely large planes (1 Planck length thick, no EM fields or anything that can act with no contact) are accelerating towards each other, such that there's 1 Planck length between them. Both are accelerating at the same rate. Can they collide? If one suddenly stops then the other plane can go the Planck length between them and contact, but if neither stops, they have to move half a Planck length to collide.

As for the co-ordinates, of course that depends on your origin, but if an object is half a Planck length away from another, it doesn't matter. If we have the aforementioned two planes split apart such that they are half-integered distances apart, then one has to go through the other or what?

Of course there's an inherent fallacy in assuming you could even have a solid object at this scale, but Planet Hypothetia has to be weird.
 
In a discrete system, a distance of 1 would be the same thing as two objects touching, being the closest two objects can possibly get two each other. So basically if two things were one Planck length apart in a discrete universe they would be colliding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K