Is space warped, or is matter expanding?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of warped space in relation to mass and gravity, emphasizing that space itself expands rather than matter expanding into a void. Participants reference Einstein's theory of relativity, which explains how light bends near massive objects, leading to the idea of warped space. The conversation also touches on the duality principle, clarifying that matter and energy are distinct yet interrelated. The second law of thermodynamics is mentioned as a factor in the expansion of matter, suggesting a quest for equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the duality principle in physics
  • Knowledge of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics, particularly particle-wave duality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Einstein's theory of general relativity and its implications on space and gravity
  • Explore the duality principle and its applications in modern physics
  • Study the second law of thermodynamics and its relevance to matter and energy
  • Investigate quantum mechanics, focusing on particle-wave duality and its interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental concepts of space, matter, and energy dynamics.

Modman
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Why do physicists say that space is warped in with the presence of mass? Wasn't the whole concept of spatial coordinates supposed to make measuring distance easier? I think it would be easier to say that matter expands outwards in the presence of space.

Also, because of the second law of thermodynamics, and since matter IS energy, would it not be logical to say that matter must continue to expand outwards until it touches other matter? Is this what we call gravity?

BTW this isn't my idea, but I think it's an awesome idea but I need someone to verify the thinking is correct.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi there,

The idea of a bending space comes from light observation. It has been thought for very long that light travels in a straight line. Just need to point a laser, and see that it does travel straight.

Thanks to relativity (this Einstein dude had something), we know now that light bends when passing near matter. Of course this is visible when light, coming from far away objects) passes near a very massive object (massive star). Therefore, trying to explain this, scientist came up with the idea of warped space.

They imagine that light follows the Universe curvature. In a flat Universe, light would travel in a straight line. Putting some massive object in this flat universe bends its curvature, forcing light to follow it.

As for the second part of your comment: matter is not energy and vice-versa. Matter can be transformed to energy. There is the duality principle. But one is not the other.
 
But due to the second law of thermodynamics, matter should still expand, correct? It is trying to reach equilibrium.
 
Modman said:
Why do physicists say that space is warped in with the presence of mass? Wasn't the whole concept of spatial coordinates supposed to make measuring distance easier? I think it would be easier to say that matter expands outwards in the presence of space.

I'm not sure you get the ideas going around. It is space itself that is expanding, rather than matter expanding into empty void.
 
What I'm trying to say is that it should be fundamentally the same, if matter is expanding or if space is warped. However, if matter is expanding, it is the expansion that causes gravity. When two particles grow at the same rate, the space between them decreases by a square root, the same as in Newton's gravity equations. This is what I am proposing.
 
fatra2 said:
As for the second part of your comment: matter is not energy and vice-versa. Matter can be transformed to energy. There is the duality principle. But one is not the other.

...then what is matter? If quantum mechanics considers particle-wave duality, how would you describe the difference between matter and energy?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K