Relativity Is Synge's Special Relativity Still Relevant Today?

AI Thread Summary
Synge's Special Relativity, while historically significant, is viewed as somewhat outdated due to its 1955 conventions, such as the use of ##x_4 = ict##. Many participants in the discussion express a preference for more modern texts, like Synge's 1960 General Relativity book or works by Pauli, Papapetrou, and Eddington. Despite its dated aspects, some argue that Synge's text provides unique spacetime-geometric insights that may not be found in contemporary literature. Overall, it is considered more suitable as a reference rather than a primary or secondary textbook for current studies.
Frabjous
Gold Member
Messages
1,952
Reaction score
2,380
I stumbled across a cheap copy of Synge’s Special Relativity. I know that it was an important book, but there is an undercurrent in the comments that it is now dated. Is it still worth spending time with?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For me, just because it was written in 1955 using ##x_4 = ict## is major reason to dismiss it. I would rather have his 1960 GR book (using a flat +++- metric) as a textbook, a more modern Pauli, Papapetrou or Eddington.
 
In my opinion, Synge's text offers some possibly useful spacetime-geometric insights not found elsewhere. So, in spite of its dated conventions and notations, it still could be useful as an interesting reference... but not as a primary or secondary textbook.
 
Thanks.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top