Is Synge's Special Relativity Still Relevant Today?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Synge's Special Relativity, published in 1955, is considered dated due to its use of conventions such as ##x_4 = ict##. While some forum participants argue that it lacks modern relevance, others highlight its unique spacetime-geometric insights that are not available in contemporary texts. The consensus suggests that while it may not serve as a primary or secondary textbook, it remains a valuable reference for specific concepts in relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with spacetime geometry
  • Knowledge of modern physics texts, such as those by Pauli and Eddington
  • Basic grasp of historical context in physics literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research modern interpretations of Special Relativity
  • Explore spacetime geometry in contemporary physics
  • Study the works of Pauli, Papapetrou, and Eddington
  • Examine critiques of historical physics texts
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in relativity, and researchers interested in the evolution of theoretical frameworks in modern physics.

Frabjous
Gold Member
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
2,405
I stumbled across a cheap copy of Synge’s Special Relativity. I know that it was an important book, but there is an undercurrent in the comments that it is now dated. Is it still worth spending time with?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For me, just because it was written in 1955 using ##x_4 = ict## is major reason to dismiss it. I would rather have his 1960 GR book (using a flat +++- metric) as a textbook, a more modern Pauli, Papapetrou or Eddington.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
In my opinion, Synge's text offers some possibly useful spacetime-geometric insights not found elsewhere. So, in spite of its dated conventions and notations, it still could be useful as an interesting reference... but not as a primary or secondary textbook.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
879