Is Synge's Special Relativity Still Relevant Today?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relevance of Synge's Special Relativity in contemporary physics education and understanding. Participants explore whether the book's dated conventions and notations affect its value as a resource compared to more modern texts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the relevance of Synge's Special Relativity due to its 1955 publication date and the use of the ##x_4 = ict## notation.
  • Another participant argues that despite its dated conventions, Synge's text may provide unique spacetime-geometric insights that are not available in other texts, suggesting it could serve as an interesting reference.
  • A third participant expresses a preference for Synge's 1960 General Relativity book and other modern texts over the Special Relativity book.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance and utility of Synge's Special Relativity, indicating that there is no consensus on its value as a resource today.

Frabjous
Gold Member
Messages
1,963
Reaction score
2,409
I stumbled across a cheap copy of Synge’s Special Relativity. I know that it was an important book, but there is an undercurrent in the comments that it is now dated. Is it still worth spending time with?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For me, just because it was written in 1955 using ##x_4 = ict## is major reason to dismiss it. I would rather have his 1960 GR book (using a flat +++- metric) as a textbook, a more modern Pauli, Papapetrou or Eddington.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
In my opinion, Synge's text offers some possibly useful spacetime-geometric insights not found elsewhere. So, in spite of its dated conventions and notations, it still could be useful as an interesting reference... but not as a primary or secondary textbook.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
998