MHB Is Tan(cos2x) equal to tan(2 cos^-1(x))?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elissa89
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that 2 cos^-1(x) is not equal to cos(2x), emphasizing that cos^-1(x) represents an angle θ where cos(θ) = x. To find tan(2 cos^-1(x)), the double angle formula for tangent is applied, along with the identity for tan(θ) derived from sin(θ) and cos(θ). Participants suggest substituting tan(θ) with its expression in terms of x and simplifying the resulting equation. The final expression for tan(2 cos^-1(x)) is derived as 2x√(1-x^2)/(2x^2-1). Understanding the distinction between cos^-1(x) and cos(2x) is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
tan(2 cos^-1(x))

I'm pretty sure 2 cos^-1(x) is the same as cos2x, the doubles formula, but from there I'm completely lost.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Elissa89 said:
tan(2 cos^-1(x))

I'm pretty sure 2 cos^-1(x) is the same as cos2x, the doubles formula, but from there I'm completely lost.

$2\cos^{-1}(x) \ne \cos(2x)$

$\cos^{-1}(x)$ is an angle (call it $\theta$) such $\cos{\theta} = x$

$\tan(2\theta) = \dfrac{2\tan{\theta}}{1-\tan^2{\theta}}$

$\cos{\theta} = x \implies \sin{\theta} = \sqrt{1-x^2} \implies \tan{\theta} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x}$

substitute the above expression for $\tan{\theta}$ in the double angle formula for tangent and simplify the algebra.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
skeeter said:
$2\cos^{-1}(x) \ne \cos(2x)$

$\cos^{-1}(x)$ is an angle (call it $\theta$) such $\cos{\theta} = x$

$\tan(2\theta) = \dfrac{2\tan{\theta}}{1-\tan^2{\theta}}$

$\cos{\theta} = x \implies \sin{\theta} = \sqrt{1-x^2} \implies \tan{\theta} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x}$

substitute the above expression for $\tan{\theta}$ in the double angle formula for tangent and simplify the algebra.

I'm not sure I understand
 
Elissa89 said:
I'm not sure I understand
What, specifically, don't you understand? We can help you better if we know this.

-Dan
 
We are having to guess at what the OP is supposed to accomplish. Is it calculating a value for the expression given a value for x or, as we are guessing, is it to find a purely algebraic expression for the given trigonometric expression; or even something else.
 
It appears that you do not understand what "cos^{-1}(x)" means! It is the inverse function to cos(x) (limited to x= 0 to \pi so that it is one-to-one). cos^{-1}(1)= 0 because cos(0)= 1. cos^{-1}(0)= \pi/2 because cos(\pi/2)= 0, etc.

The basic fact you need to use here is that cos(cos^{-1}(x))= x so you should try to change that "tan(2..)" to "cos(..)". I would start by using the identity tan(2x)= \frac{2 tan(x)}{1- tan^2(x)}. Now use the fact that tan(x)= \frac{sin(x)}{cos(x)} and then that sin(x)= \sqrt{1- cos^2(x)}: tan(2x)= \frac{2 tan(x)}{1- tan^2(x)}= \frac{2\frac{\sqrt{1- cos^2(x)}}{cos(x)}}{1- \frac{1- cos^2(x)}{cos^2(x)}}.

Replacing each "x" with cos^{-1}(x) changes each "cos(x)" to "x" so that
tan(2cos^{-1}(x))= \frac{2\frac{\sqrt{1- x^2}}{x}}{1- \frac{1- x^2}{x^2}}= \frac{2x\sqrt{1- x^2}}{2x^2- 1}.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top