Is tan: (-π/2, π/2) -> R a Homeomorphism?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical properties of the tangent function defined on the interval (-π/2, π/2) and its relationship to homeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms. Participants are exploring the continuity of the function and its inverse, as well as the implications of these properties in the context of topology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to demonstrate that the tangent function is a homeomorphism by showing the continuity of both the function and its inverse. Questions arise regarding the conditions under which these properties hold and the implications of the function being one-to-one and onto.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the definitions and properties of the tangent function and its inverse. Some have provided insights into the continuity of the function based on different definitions, while others are exploring the implications of the function being onto and the nature of its inverse.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential misunderstandings regarding the behavior of the tangent function at the boundaries of its domain, as well as the need for clarity on the definitions of continuity in this context. Participants are also considering the implications of using power series for sine and cosine in their proofs.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Show that tan: (-pie/2,pie/2)->R is a homeomorphism where tan = sin/cos

To show that f and f^-1 are cts, it seems trivial from a sketch but how do you do it?

For 1-1 tan(x) = tan(y)

Need to knwo x =y

tan(x) = sinx.cosx = siny/cosy = tany

=> sixcosy = sinycosx

this gets you sin(x-y) = 0
But x-y = pie

What's wrong here?

Onto is obvious
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are infinitely many solutions to the equation sin t = 0... but not many that are consistent with the conditions of your problem.

(Incidentally, it's not just a homeomorphism, but also a diffeomorphism. That's easier to prove, since we're in dimension 1. :wink:)
 
Then it must be 0 because the domain is the interval (-pie/2,pie/2)

So how do I show that f and f^-1 are cts?
 
How have you defined them? e.g. showing tan to be continuous is trivial if you've defined sine and cosine via power series (or are allowed to use their power series)
 
So for onto
for all y in R there exists an x in (-pie/2,pie/2) s.t. f(x)=y

WTS: tanx = y

Let y = siny/cosy = tany

let x = y => y = tany = tanx

is that sufficient? y could be inf.
 
How can y be 'inf'? Neither is infinity in R, nor is pi/2 (pi does not have an e) in the interval (-pi/2,pi/2).
 
So then how would you show f^-1 is cts ?
 
Okay let me try again.

To show that f is cts pick an open subset G in R. then f-1 = arc tanx: R -> -pie/2, pie/2)

Suppose G is the interval (a,b).

Let f-1(G) = A. Thus A is contained in (-pie/2,pie/2)

f-1(G) is an element of (f-1(a),f-1(b))=A

which is an open subset and therefore cts.

To show that the inverse of f is cts.

we want to show that for any open G in (-pie/2,pie/2) thus f-1(G) = A where A is open.

IF G = (a,b) then f-1(G) is an element of (f-1(a),f-1(b)) = (tana,tanb) which is an open interval.

and hence cts.

Is this correct?
 
Okay, is there anything wrong with it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K