MHB Is tan(x)^2 proper notation for the trig function tangent squared?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the notation for the tangent function squared, specifically comparing tan^2(x) and tan(x)^2. Participants agree that tan^2(x) clearly indicates (tan x)^2, while tan(x)^2 can be ambiguous regarding whether the argument or the function is squared. Some express that tan(x)^2 is acceptable syntax, particularly in calculators, but prefer clearer expressions like tan(x) * tan(x). The inclusion of parentheses in tan(x)^2 helps clarify the expression's meaning. Overall, clarity in mathematical notation is emphasized as crucial for understanding.
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Is tan^2 (x) the same as tan(x)^2?

Note: I could have used any trig function.

I know that tan^2 (x) means (tan x)^2.
What does tan (x)^2 mean? Is it proper notation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't consider $$\tan(x)^2$$ to be proper notation. It is unclear whether the argument or the function is being squared.
 
MarkFL said:
I don't consider $$\tan(x)^2$$ to be proper notation. It is unclear whether the argument or the function is being squared.

I concur.
 
$\tan(x)^2$ is an acceptable form of syntax for $\tan^2{x}$ used in many calculators.
 
Personally I would like to see [math]tan(x)^2 = tan(x) \cdot tan(x)[/math]. My problem isn't with the 2 but with a -1. [math]f^{-1}(x)[/math] may be equally considered to be [math]\dfrac{1}{f(x)}[/math] or the inverse function of f(x).

So long as the parenthesis are included in [math]tan(x)^2[/math] I have no problem with the expression.

-Dan
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top