Is taxonomy intrinsic or a human invention

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr200backstrok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Invention
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether taxonomy is an intrinsic property of life or a human construct. Participants argue that taxonomy, particularly in the context of asexual species, is primarily a human invention, as it originated from arbitrary observations. Advances in DNA sequencing have enabled phylogenetic categorization, revealing true relationships among species, such as the reclassification of the Lotus plant family. However, the inherent fuzziness in defining species suggests that categorization is ultimately a human endeavor, driven by our innate desire to classify and identify.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cladistics and its historical context in taxonomy
  • Familiarity with DNA sequencing techniques and their implications for phylogenetics
  • Knowledge of species classification and the challenges involved
  • Awareness of cognitive biases in human perception and categorization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of cladistics and its role in modern taxonomy
  • Explore the impact of DNA sequencing on phylogenetic analysis
  • Study the concept of species definition and the ongoing debates surrounding it
  • Investigate cognitive psychology related to human categorization and perception
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, taxonomists, evolutionary scientists, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of classification in biology.

mr200backstrok
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
is taxonomy an intrinsic property of life, or a human way to look at it?

I think, especially with asexual species, that it is really a human invention, not an actual property of life. However, certain things fit well. what do you think?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Originally, taxonomy was created cladistically. Meaning the "relationships"
were derived from abitrary human observations.

With DNA sequencing it is now possible to have phylogenetic (actual family tree) categorization of species. For example, the Lotus (water lily) plant family was moved away from a place in the tree that had it next to roses.
It's closest living relative turns out to be the plane trees (sycamore). This line of descent thing is an actual property of living things.

The fuzz you are referring to is the fact that our definition of species is not and likely will never be perfect.
 
so the idea of trying to force all of life into distinct categories is ... human?

I understand all the phylogenetic tree stuff...
 
Sure. Have you ever seen a face in the clouds? One of our human survival abilities is to use mental templates to identify things. Some templates, like face identification appear to be hard-wired. We can't not do it, in other words. It's a good survival thing to see a tiger face staring at you so you can run away, instead of becoming tiger chow.

Categorization is something humans have an innate desire/ability to do.
And we can create them when in reality there is no category. Only a perceived one.
 
alright, that's what i thought. thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
673