princeton118
- 33
- 0
If a space is of n dimension, then the boundary of this space is n-1 dimension or not?
The boundary of an n-dimensional space is definitively n-1 dimensional, as established in the discussion. For instance, a 2-dimensional circle has a 1-dimensional boundary, while a 3-dimensional sphere has a 2-dimensional boundary. However, the concept of "boundary" can become ambiguous in abstract spaces, as illustrated by the graph of the function y = sin(1/x) for x in (0, 1), which raises questions about defining boundaries in pathological cases. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that a line cannot effectively divide a 3-dimensional manifold, as it does not create separate regions.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the properties of dimensions and boundaries in geometric and abstract spaces.
Say it more clearly, why we use a line or curve to divide the 2 dimension manifold, why we use a 2 dimension surface to divide the 3 dimension manifold?Hurkyl said:Alas, his question was incredibly vague; as stated it doesn't make any sense, because the concept of "boundary" doesn't really make sense for an abstract space, and there are lots of pathologies even for "usual" spaces.
For example, consider the graph of the function
y = \sin \left( \frac{1}{x} \right) \quad \quad x \in (0, 1).
How are you going to define the boundary of this curve? Once you've chosen a definition, is it zero-dimensional? (Note that the closure of the graph of this curve consists of the entire line segment x = 0 \wedge y \in [-1, 1])