MHB Is the Calculated Osculating Plane and Binormal Correct for $\theta=0$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assistance
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on verifying the correctness of the calculated osculating plane and binormal at $\theta=0$. The initial claim states the osculating plane equation as $-\sqrt{\frac{1}{6}}x + \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}z - \sqrt{\frac{1}{6}}=0$ and the binormal as $\hat{B}(\theta=0)=\left[-\sqrt{\frac{1}{6}},-\sqrt{\frac{1}{6}},\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\right]$. Another participant provides an alternative calculation for the osculating plane and binormal, concluding that at $\theta=0$, the plane is 0 and the binormal is $\left[0,\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\right]$. The conversation highlights discrepancies in the calculations and seeks confirmation on the correct values. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate mathematical derivations in determining the osculating plane and binormal.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
378
Reaction score
30
1624277707751.png


I am working on this question. Any math help, hint or even correct answer will be accepted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Answer to question (a): The equation of the osculating plane at $\theta=0$ is $-\sqrt{\frac16}x + \sqrt{\frac23}z -\sqrt{\frac16}=0$ and binormal $\hat{B}(\theta=0)=\left[-\sqrt{\frac16},-\sqrt{\frac16},\sqrt{\frac23}\right]$

Is this answer correct? In my opinion, it should be correct.

Answer (b):$\vec{r}(\theta)=\left[2\cosh{\frac{\theta}{2}}, 2\sinh{\frac{\theta}{2}},2\theta\right] \implies \vec{r'}(\theta)=\left[\sinh{\frac{\theta}{2}}, \cosh{\frac{\theta}{2}},2\right],||\vec{r'}(\theta)||=\sqrt{\sinh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+\cosh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+4}$
$||\vec{r'}(\theta)||_{(\theta=0)}=\sqrt{[0,1,4]}=\sqrt{5}, \hat{T}(\theta)=\left[\frac{\sinh{\frac{\theta}{2}}}{\sqrt{\sinh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+\cosh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+4}}, \frac{\cosh{\frac{\theta}{2}}}{\sqrt{\sinh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+\cosh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+4}},\frac{2}{ \sqrt{\sinh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+\cosh^2{\frac{\theta}{2}}+4}} \right],\hat{T}(\theta)_{(\theta=0)}=[0,\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}},\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}]$

Equation of the osculating plane at $\theta=0$ is 0 and binormal to the curve at point (2,0,0) is $\left[0,\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\right]$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K