- #1

- 375

- 28

How to answer this question? Any math help will be accepted. I am working on this question. If any member of Math help board know the correct answer, may reply.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

In summary, the conversation discusses the proposition that if C is a simple closed curve in the xy plane that does not enclose the origin, then the line integral of a vector field F, given by $\vec{F} = \frac{yi + xj}{x^2 + y^2}$, along C is equal to 0. However, it is proven that this proposition is incorrect as the curl of $\vec{F}$ is nonzero. A potential function is defined for a conservative vector field, and it is shown that $\vec{F}$ does have a potential function. It is also shown through a concrete counterexample that the line integral along any curve C in the given example is equal to 0. The conversationf

- #1

- 375

- 28

How to answer this question? Any math help will be accepted. I am working on this question. If any member of Math help board know the correct answer, may reply.

- #2

Gold Member

MHB

POTW Director

- 2,038

- 1,408

- #3

- 375

- 28

A real valued function F(x,y) such that $\nabla {F(x,y)}=f(x,y)$ is called

Now, in our problem, we have to show that $\vec{F} =\frac{yi +xj}{x^2+y^2}$ is a conservative vector field (It has a potential).

Thus, a potential $\mathcal{F(x,y)}$ for $F(x,y) = \frac{yi}{x^2+y^2} + \frac{xj}{x^2+y^2}$ exists, namely,

$$ \arctan{(\frac{x}{y})} + \arctan{(\frac{y}{x})}.$$

You can verify in your example that the value of line integral

$$\displaystyle\int_C\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = \mathcal{F} (2,0) - \mathcal{F} (1,0) = \arctan{(\frac20)} + \arctan{(\frac02)} - \arctan{(\frac10)}-\arctan{(\frac01)} = \frac{\pi}{2} -\frac{\pi}{2} =0$$

- #4

- 1,957

- 994

A potential function exists if and only if the curl of the vector field is zero. Here we have \(\displaystyle \nabla \times \left ( \dfrac{y}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{i} + \dfrac{x}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{j} \right ) = - \dfrac{2 (x^2 - y^2)}{(x^2 + y^2)^2} \hat{k}\).View attachment 11853

A real valued function F(x,y) such that $\nabla {F(x,y)}=f(x,y)$ is calledpotentialforf.Aconservativevector field is one which has a potential.

Now, in our problem, we have to show that $\vec{F} =\frac{yi +xj}{x^2+y^2}$ is a conservative vector field (It has a potential).

Thus, a potential $\mathcal{F(x,y)}$ for $F(x,y) = \frac{yi}{x^2+y^2} + \frac{xj}{x^2+y^2}$ exists, namely,

$$ \arctan{(\frac{x}{y})} + \arctan{(\frac{y}{x})}.$$

You can verify in your example that the value of line integralFalong any curve C going from (1,0) to (2,0) or from (2,0) to (2,1) or from (2,1) to (1,1) and finally from (1,1) to (1,0) will always be zero. Since by above given theorem

$$\displaystyle\int_C\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = \mathcal{F} (2,0) - \mathcal{F} (1,0) = \arctan{(\frac20)} + \arctan{(\frac02)} - \arctan{(\frac10)}-\arctan{(\frac01)} = \frac{\pi}{2} -\frac{\pi}{2} =0$$

-Dan

- #5

- 375

- 28

$\nabla \times \bigg(\frac{y}{x^2+y^2}, \frac{x}{x^2+y^2},0\bigg)= \begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \hat{i} (0 - 0) +\hat{j} (0 - 0) + \hat{k} \bigg(\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2} -\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}\bigg)= 0 $A potential function exists if and only if the curl of the vector field is zero. Here we have \(\displaystyle \nabla \times \left ( \dfrac{y}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{i} + \dfrac{x}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{j} \right ) = - \dfrac{2 (x^2 - y^2)}{(x^2 + y^2)^2} \hat{k}\).

-Dan

My computation of curl of conservative vector field is zero. How is that?(Bigsmile)(Clapping)

Last edited:

- #6

- 1,957

- 994

A typo? Check the (3,2) component.$\nabla \times \bigg(\frac{y}{x^2+y^2}, \frac{x}{x^2+y^2},0\bigg)= \begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \hat{i} (0 - 0) +\hat{j} (0 - 0) + \hat{k} \bigg(\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2} -\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}\bigg)= 0 $

My computation of curl of conservative vector field is zero. How is that?(Bigsmile)(Clapping)

\begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix}

\(\displaystyle \dfrac{ \partial }{ \partial x} \dfrac{x}{x^2 + y^2} - \dfrac{ \partial }{ \partial y} \dfrac{y}{x^2 + y^2} = \dfrac{((x^2 + y^2) - x(2x) ) - ((x^2 + y^2) - y(2y) }{ (x^2 + y^2)^2} = -2 \dfrac{x^2 - y^2}{(x^2 + y^2)^2}\)

-Dan

Last edited by a moderator:

- #7

- 375

- 28

Thanks. I corrected that now. You are correct. Curl of $\vec{f}$ is nonzero.A typo? Check the (3,2) component.

\begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix}

-Dan

Last edited:

Share:

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 924

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 864

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 755

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 1K