Is the CD Phenomenon Related to Young's Fringes?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Roodles01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser laser pointer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the diffraction phenomenon observed when a red laser pointer is directed at a CD, specifically addressing its relationship to Young's fringes. Participants emphasize that the diffraction pattern arises from the vectorial addition of reflections from the CD's surface, which can be understood through wave theory rather than particle theory. The conversation advises focusing on wave mechanics to grasp the underlying principles of diffraction effectively, dismissing the relevance of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave theory and diffraction principles
  • Familiarity with laser optics and light behavior
  • Basic knowledge of vector addition in physics
  • Concept of interference patterns, specifically Young's fringes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of wave diffraction and its mathematical descriptions
  • Explore the concept of interference patterns in detail, focusing on Young's experiment
  • Study the behavior of light as a wave, including reflection and refraction
  • Investigate practical applications of diffraction in optical devices
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching optics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of wave theory in understanding light behavior.

Roodles01
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Hi.
When I point my red laser pointer at the playable side of a CD at an angle the spot becomes diffracted, a bit like the fringes you can get if you put a hair across the beam.

Could you keep to the CD phenomenon, when trying to explain and whether it really is related to Youngs Fringes or Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle please.
Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
This doesn't need Heisenberg (there are smartarse ways of doing it - as usual - but it's not the best way to approach any of this stuff at this sort of level). Treat it as straight Diffraction. The Max's and Min's are there because of the way the reflections from each part of the disc add up (vectorially) in the various directions. Treat these things in terms of waves and you can't go wrong. Waves are just as valid as particles and you should get competent enough with the wave approach before launching into particles. Probability densities, and all that, are great when you really know what you are doing but some approaches to problem solving are harder than making love standing up in a hammock.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K