Is the curl of a div. free vector field perpendicular to the field?

  • Thread starter Wuberdall
  • Start date
  • #1
34
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi PF-members.

My intuition tells me that: Given a divergence free vector field [itex] \mathbf{F} [/itex], then the curl of the field will be perpendicular to field.
But I'm having a hard time proving this to my self.

I'know that : [itex] \nabla\cdot\mathbf{F} = 0 \hspace{3mm} \Rightarrow \hspace{3mm} \exists\mathbf{A}: \mathbf{F} = \nabla\times\mathbf{A} [/itex]

Therefore : [itex] \mathbf{F}\cdot(\nabla\times\mathbf{F}) = 0 \hspace{3mm} \Rightarrow \hspace{3mm} [\nabla\times\mathbf{A}]\cdot[\nabla\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})] = 0 [/itex]

But I can't prove that this actually equals zero... Please help!!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
140
16
Off the top of my head (as in, there are probably less artificial examples):

Let [itex]\mathbf{F} = (x-z,y-z,-2z)[/itex]. As [itex]\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = 1+1-2=0[/itex], the field is divergence-free. However, [itex]\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = (1,-1,0)[/itex], so, clearly, [itex]\mathbf{F}\cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})\not{\equiv}0[/itex] and by contradiction, your intuition seems to be wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
34
0
Gracias.
 

Related Threads on Is the curl of a div. free vector field perpendicular to the field?

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
867
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Top