I Is the existence of a Dyson Sphere impossible?

AI Thread Summary
A monolithic Dyson Sphere is deemed impossible with current materials due to structural limitations, but theoretical concepts like a Dyson Balloon could work by utilizing solar radiation pressure. This balloon would require active control to maintain its position around a star, effectively making it a leaky Dyson Sphere. A Dyson Swarm, composed of multiple smaller structures, may be a more feasible option for harnessing stellar energy. Such designs could potentially maximize energy capture while reducing detectability to other civilizations. Overall, while a monolithic Dyson Sphere is impractical, alternative concepts offer intriguing possibilities for energy collection.
HystereeSis
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Specifically a monolithic Dyson Sphere; also, how would a Dyson Swarm work / be a better option?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
HystereeSis said:
Is the existence of a Dyson Sphere impossible?
Not specifically, no.
HystereeSis said:
also, how would a Dyson Swarm work / be a better option?
Better option for what?

Is this a science fiction question?
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander and jim mcnamara
A monolithic Dyson sphere without moving parts wouldn't be possible with materials we know, but in principle you can stabilize it with fast-moving (faster than orbital velocity) components.
 
Perhaps one could make a Dyson Balloon inflated by solar radiation pressure around a star but there would have to be some sort of active control to keep the balloon centered around the star by manipulating the surface transmission/reflection coefficients to compensate for drift so it would amount to a leaky Dyson sphere. Of course one could not build structures on such a surface but it might go a long way towards Dyson's goal of using all (or most) of the star's energy and making the star less detectable to outside civilizations.
 
Last edited:
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top