Is the Gamma Function Equal to Its Simplified Form?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 3K views
homad2000
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello, I need help proving this:

[URL]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/GammaFunction/Inline177.gif[/URL] = [URL]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/GammaFunction/Inline179.gif[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to find gamma(1/2) easily enough. A change of variable makes the integral representation a gaussian. Now use gamma(z+1)=z*gamma(z) to find gamma(-1/2). Use that to find gamma(-3/2) etc. Use induction for the general case.
 
I'm so dumb, it can be proved by induction, of course.

[tex]\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right) = \frac{(-1)^{n} 2^{n}}{(2n-1)!} \sqrt{\pi}[/tex]

Induction says that, if, for a specific n, P(n) is true and you manage to show that P(n+1) is true as well, then P(n) is true for all n from N.

So

[tex]\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-(n+1)\right) = \Gamma\left(\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right) -1\right) = \frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right)-1}}\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right) = \frac{(-1)\cdot 2}{(2n+1)} \Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right)[/tex]

Now plug what it's in the hypothesis, and you'll get your answer.
 
brilliant! i haven't thought of induction! but i solved it using another identity:

%20formula%20}\operatorname{\Gamma}(\alpha)\operatorname{\Gamma}(1-\alpha)=\pi\,\csc\,\pi\alpha..gif
 

Attachments

  • %20formula%20}\operatorname{\Gamma}(\alpha)\operatorname{\Gamma}(1-\alpha)=\pi\,\csc\,\pi\alpha..gif
    %20formula%20}\operatorname{\Gamma}(\alpha)\operatorname{\Gamma}(1-\alpha)=\pi\,\csc\,\pi\alpha..gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 458
using the identity:[tex]\Gamma[/tex](x) [tex]\Gamma[/tex](1-x) = [tex]\pi[/tex] / sin(pi *x)