Is the Hard Sphere Collision Cross Section for 3-Body Systems Always Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brad sue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Collision
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I was reading an article and I have this affirmation i don't know if correct:
the hard sphere collision cross section for 3 bodies always equal to zero. Is it true?

Why should it be?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to provide a reference or at least a definition for "hard sphere".

In the classical sense, it is surely unlikely that three bodies make contact simultaneously. But are you talking of a classical or a quantum system?
 
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
You might want to provide a reference or at least a definition for "hard sphere".

In the classical sense, it is surely unlikely that three bodies make contact simultaneously. But are you talking of a classical or a quantum system?

Hard sphere is the "normal" cross section we have in classical physics namely pi*radius^2.
we are in quantum system and usually thr cross section is function of the particle speeds.

I am trying to understand this 3 body cross section with the quantum energy bound states but all those curves drive me crazy! maybe it is not the good way to approach it...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top