Is the Homotopy Type Equality of X x Y and X' x Y' Always True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Type
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the homotopy types of product spaces, specifically questioning whether the homotopy type equality of X x Y and X' x Y' implies homotopy type equality of X and X' or Y and Y'. The subject area is algebraic topology, focusing on homotopy theory and product spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the possibility of counterexamples to the original question, with some suggesting that simple spaces, such as products of circles, might serve as examples. Others question the validity of the assumption that homotopy type equality of product spaces leads to similar conclusions for the individual spaces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants offering insights and counterexamples. Some have proposed specific cases and examples, while others express uncertainty about the implications of the original question. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original question may fail under certain conditions, such as when one of the spaces is homotopic to a point. There is also mention of the complexity introduced by infinite products and the potential for trivial counterexamples.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32

Homework Statement


Is it true that if X x Y has the same homotopy type as X' x Y', then X has the same homotopy type as X' or Y' and Y has the same homotopy type as Y' or X' (the one not already in use by X).

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried finding a counter-exemple, but no luck. I've also established that the (natural) procedure to show that [itex]X\simeq X', \ \ Y\simeq Y' \ \Rightarrow X\times Y \simeq X'\times Y'[/itex] does not work in the other direction (i.e. we can't go backward from explicit homotopies btw X x Y and X' x Y' to explicit homotopies btw X and Y and X' and Y')
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is easy to think of counter examples if you're simple minded. I.e. don't try to think of producting together complicated spaces for a counter example. You can get one with just products of circles involved.

It's asking if, whenever you write a space as a product of two spaces, then there is only one possible choice of pair of homotopy type for the two spaces. This can't be true, we feel, and sure enough if we just pick *any* space that is the product of two non-contractible spaces we're going to have a good chance of getting a counter example.

So all I've asked for is a space

Z=XxY

Can you see what to do now (given I don't apparently have an X' and a Y' lying around?)
 
Of course a more interesting question* is:

suppse that XxY and X'xY are homotopic. Does the cancellation property hold? I.e. is X homotopic to X'
* you original question is almost never going to be true. It's like me asking: if N=p*q and N=r*s does it follow thaht p=r (or p=s). That's only true for primes or products of two primes.
 
Last edited:
the original question fails even when exactly one of the spaces is (homotopic to) a point.

i don't have a candidate for the second question.

i might be able to think up a situation where the product spaces both have the same homology (say trivial) but not the original ones.

using kunneth, one could try for some torsion groups that kill each other off under tensoring.

no wait, what about taking a product of an infinite number of circles, first with a point, then with a circle? here you even get homeomorphism of the products, but the factors X,X' are not even homotopy equivalent.
 
matt grime said:
It is easy to think of counter examples if you're simple minded. I.e. don't try to think of producting together complicated spaces for a counter example. You can get one with just products of circles involved.

It's asking if, whenever you write a space as a product of two spaces, then there is only one possible choice of pair of homotopy type for the two spaces. This can't be true, we feel, and sure enough if we just pick *any* space that is the product of two non-contractible spaces we're going to have a good chance of getting a counter example.

So all I've asked for is a space

Z=XxY

Can you see what to do now (given I don't apparently have an X' and a Y' lying around?)
Hi matt, I've read your post 203 times and still don't see what your idea is. :frown:
 
One trivial counterexample comes from taking one of the spaces to be a point, in which case the product is homeomorphic to the other factor.
 
You're saying set X={p} and let Y be anything. Then, X x Y ~ Y. But this is does not meet the hypothesis. The hypothesis is that X x Y has the same homotopy type as some product X' x Y'.
 
Just think a little harder.
 
Stop torturing me, I've explored all logical extension and implications available to all 4 of my neural links. Plus, the exam is in 16 hours.

Mercy!
 
  • #10
Take Y itself to be a product, such that Y is not homotopy equivalent to either of its factors (eg, S^1 x S^1).

Get some sleep before the test. It's much more important for you to be able to think up simple things like this than anything you might memorize while studying.
 
  • #11
Don't worry, it's only 17h35 here and the exam is tomorrow morning at 10h30 so I have time to do both.

And thank you. Maybe I would have found it after thinking for 10 years.
 
  • #12
quasar987 said:
And thank you. Maybe I would have found it after thinking for 10 years.
What that S^1xS^1 and {pt}x(S^1xS^1)

are a counter example? I'd hope not. Just think about tori (i.e. T^n is S^1xS^1x..xS^1 n-1 times).

Just forget homotopy, since that is misleading. Are you saying that you can't think of reasonalbe counter examples to the assertion: however I write a space as the product of two spaces, then I get the same answer (up to some level of equivalence)?

@mathwonk: allowing infinitely many terms would always produce a counter example. It's just Krull-Schmidt. I have an interesting (open, hard) problem on K-S for triangulated categories. Perhaps I'll ask you in August when I shouold be in Athens.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K