Is the Idea of a Continuum Always an Approximation to the Physical?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the continuum in physics, particularly in the context of space-time and its implications in general relativity and quantum mechanics. Participants explore whether the continuum is merely an approximation of physical reality and the limits of its applicability, especially in extreme conditions like black hole singularities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the continuum is always an idealization of physical reality, suggesting that reality may be discrete at smaller scales.
  • Others argue that the continuum concept breaks down in extreme situations, such as in quantum mechanics and general relativity, but it remains a useful model in many contexts.
  • A participant notes that the question of whether the space-time continuum is a mathematical approximation is still open and a subject of ongoing research in quantum gravity.
  • One response emphasizes that without empirical validation, theoretical ideas about the continuum remain speculative.
  • Another participant challenges the premise of the original question, asserting that the limits of the continuum concept do not necessarily invalidate its applicability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the continuum, with some asserting it is an idealization while others maintain its applicability in various physical theories. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the continuum's relationship to physical reality and its limitations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of experimental evidence supporting the idea that the continuum may be an idealization, and the discussion highlights the dependence on theoretical frameworks without empirical validation.

walkeraj
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
Question: When thinking of continuums the most notable seems to be space-time but they also mark a simplification to reality like in continuum mechanics, often taught when learning the tensor calculus needed for general relativity.

The question is that for general relativity when a geodesic becomes incomplete as can happen in a singularity situation for black holes, what does this say about the idea of a continuum as space-time in general relativity? Does this mark the limit of applicability of the continuum concept? Is space-time continuum truly only a mathematical approximation to something physical? (If this last question is too philosophical, omit it.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mister i
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question. The problem is to find a viable model of discrete spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
I think that the continuum is always an idealization of physical reality, even in classical mechanics. My DE professor used to say: "Reality is discrete if you look closely enough." Nevertheless, we use DE to describe it successfully. Doesn't the continuum already break down in QM? Nevertheless, we use continuous transformation groups" (old-fashioned for Lie groups) to describe it. Our models break in extreme situations, Newton at high speed, and GR (possibly?) at close ranges.
 
walkeraj said:
for general relativity when a geodesic becomes incomplete as can happen in a singularity situation for black holes, what does this say about the idea of a continuum as space-time in general relativity?
Nothing. You already posted a separate thread on this, which has now been closed as it is based on an invalid premise.

walkeraj said:
Does this mark the limit of applicability of the continuum concept?
No. See above.

walkeraj said:
Is space-time continuum truly only a mathematical approximation to something physical?
This is a separate question from the above two, and this thread should be limited to discussing it. The short answer is that this is still an open question and is a subject of research in quantum gravity. So far nobody has come up with a model that makes any useful predictions that are testable with our current technology and have passed any such tests.
 
This question is impossible to answer, and at best is philosophical (see PF Rules) and at worst...um...worse. It boils down to "As we look at smaller and smaller scales, mighy we discover that thinsg we thinka re continuous are really discrete (or for that matter, things we think are discrete are just conglomerations of things we thought were continuous.): Maybe yes, maybe no. No way to tell.

But without comparison to the real world, it ain't science.
 
fresh_42 said:
I think that the continuum is always an idealization of physical reality, even in classical mechanics.
There are others that also share this opinion, but it is important to recognize that as of today there is no experimental evidence to support that idea. It is in the theoretical physics literature, but without any experimental validation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ersmith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
959
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K