Is the Inequality Valid with Positive x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter s3a
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical inequality derived from the second derivative of a function, specifically the equation d²y/dt² = 6Hu²/L² - 12Hxu²/L³. The main point of contention is whether the term -12Hxu²/L³ can be disregarded when x is positive, leading to the inequality 6Hu²/L² <= A. Participants express confusion over the implications of ignoring this term, as it appears to alter the inequality's validity. The conclusion emphasizes that removing the negative term does not necessarily maintain the inequality's truth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically second derivatives.
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of inequalities.
  • Knowledge of positive and negative term impacts in mathematical expressions.
  • Basic grasp of calculus concepts related to motion and forces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of ignoring terms in inequalities in calculus.
  • Learn about the properties of inequalities involving positive and negative coefficients.
  • Explore differential equations and their applications in physics.
  • Review examples of similar inequalities to solidify understanding of term significance.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those tackling differential equations and inequalities, as well as educators looking for examples of common misconceptions in mathematical reasoning.

s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Hello, everyone. :)

I'm having trouble with problem 2.26(b) from the attached PDF file.

Homework Equations


d^2 y/dt^2 = 6Hu^2/L^2 - 12Hxu^2/L^3
d^2 y/dt^2 <= A
6Hu^2/L^2 - 12Hxu^2/L^3 <= A
6Hu^2/L^2 <= A

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand why the fact that x > 0 means that the term -12Hxu^2/L^3 in d^2 y/dt^2 = 6Hu^2/L^2 - 12Hxu^2/L^3 can be ignored.

To me, it seems that removing it makes the inequality go from some_quantity <= A to some_larger_quantity <= A. How does one justify that?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
s3a said:
To me, it seems that removing it makes the inequality go from some_quantity <= A to some_larger_quantity <= A. How does one justify that?
It doesn't make any sense to me, either.
If you have x - b <= A, with b being positive, it doesn't necessarily follow that x <= A.
Simple example: 12 - 3 <= 10, but 12 > 10.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K