Is the Integrability of a Function Determined by the Measure of Its Boundary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let Q be a rectangle in [tex]\mathbb{R}^n[/tex]. Let S be a subset of Q. Consider the characteristic function of S on Q given by [tex]f_s (x) = 1[/tex] if x is in S, and 0 otherwise.
Prove that [tex]f_s[/tex] is integrable if and only if bd(S) has measure 0.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't see how this statement can be true. For example, let S be the set of irrationals in Q = [0,1]. bd(S) is the rationals in [0,1], which has measure 0. So the characteristic function of S [tex]f_s[/tex] should be integrable on [0,1], but it's obviously not, because for any partition P, the upper sums equal 1 and the lower sums equal 0.

Is my thinking correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JG89 said:

Homework Statement



Let Q be a rectangle in [tex]\mathbb{R}^n[/tex]. Let S be a subset of Q. Consider the characteristic function of S on Q given by [tex]f_s (x) = 1[/tex] if x is in S, and 0 otherwise.
Prove that [tex]f_s[/tex] is integrable if and only if bd(S) has measure 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't see how this statement can be true. For example, let S be the set of irrationals in Q = [0,1]. bd(S) is the rationals in [0,1], which has measure 0. So the characteristic function of S [tex]f_s[/tex] should be integrable on [0,1], but it's obviously not, because for any partition P, the upper sums equal 1 and the lower sums equal 0.

Is my thinking correct?
No, it isn't. Q has measure 0 but its boundary is the set of all real numbers in [0, 1] and has measure 1.